Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMVIX vs RGACX
CMVIX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts CMVIX vs RGACX
BlackRock Advantage Large Cap Gr Instl
Price$28.77
Change+$0.11 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.59B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$84.36
Change+$0.32 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.88B
CMVIX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMVIX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMVIX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. CMVIX (1.59B). RGACX pays higher dividends than CMVIX: RGACX (0.07) vs CMVIX (0.00). CMVIX was incepted earlier than RGACX: CMVIX (32 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than CMVIX (0.80). CMVIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 149.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMVIX: RGACX (250) vs CMVIX (2000000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.22 vs. CMVIX (6.95). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 45.63 vs. CMVIX (42.53).
| CMVIX | RGACX | CMVIX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.94 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.94 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.895 | 17.183 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 250 | 800,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.59B | 337B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.95 | 12.22 | 57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.64 | 71.26 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.53 | 45.63 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | 152.37 | 111.15 | 137% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement