Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMVIX vs RGACX
CMVIX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts CMVIX vs RGACX
BlackRock Advantage Large Cap Gr Instl
Price$27.88
Change+$0.20 (+0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.54B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$83.16
Change+$0.19 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
CMVIX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMVIX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMVIX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. CMVIX (1.54B). RGACX pays higher dividends than CMVIX: RGACX (0.07) vs CMVIX (0.00). CMVIX was incepted earlier than RGACX: CMVIX (32 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than CMVIX (0.80). CMVIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 149.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMVIX: RGACX (250) vs CMVIX (2000000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.83 vs. CMVIX (9.62). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 40.02 vs. CMVIX (32.63).
| CMVIX | RGACX | CMVIX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.94 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.94 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.580 | 15.516 | 62% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 250 | 800,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.54B | 332B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.62 | 17.83 | 54% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.05 | 58.53 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.63 | 40.02 | 82% |
| Returns for 10 years | 130.71 | 95.93 | 136% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement