CMTOY
Price
$12.74
Change
+$0.41 (+3.33%)
Updated
Aug 13 closing price
Capitalization
3.38B
80 days until earnings call
HCMLF
Price
$82.75
Change
-$0.25 (-0.30%)
Updated
Aug 13 closing price
Capitalization
46.28B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CMTOY vs HCMLF

Header iconCMTOY vs HCMLF Comparison
Open Charts CMTOY vs HCMLFBanner chart's image
Cementos Argos S.A
Price$12.74
Change+$0.41 (+3.33%)
Volume$108
Capitalization3.38B
HOLCIM
Price$82.75
Change-$0.25 (-0.30%)
Volume$365
Capitalization46.28B
CMTOY vs HCMLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CMTOY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HCMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMTOY vs. HCMLF commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMTOY is a StrongBuy and HCMLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (CMTOY: $12.74 vs. HCMLF: $82.75)
Brand notoriety: CMTOY and HCMLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMTOY: 5% vs. HCMLF: 3%
Market capitalization -- CMTOY: $3.38B vs. HCMLF: $46.28B
CMTOY [@Construction Materials] is valued at $3.38B. HCMLF’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $46.28B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $74.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $10.15B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMTOY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHCMLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CMTOY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • HCMLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CMTOY and HCMLF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMTOY’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HCMLF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMTOY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • HCMLF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CMTOY is a better buy in the short-term than HCMLF.

Price Growth

CMTOY (@Construction Materials) experienced а +3.37% price change this week, while HCMLF (@Construction Materials) price change was -0.30% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was +0.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.16%.

Reported Earning Dates

CMTOY is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (+0.43% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HCMLF($46.3B) has a higher market cap than CMTOY($3.38B). CMTOY has higher P/E ratio than HCMLF: CMTOY (18.29) vs HCMLF (11.73). HCMLF YTD gains are higher at: 64.212 vs. CMTOY (7.591).
CMTOYHCMLFCMTOY / HCMLF
Capitalization3.38B46.3B7%
EBITDAN/A6.95B-
Gain YTD7.59164.21212%
P/E Ratio18.2911.73156%
RevenueN/A26.2B-
Total CashN/A4.24B-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMTOY vs HCMLF: Fundamental Ratings
CMTOY
HCMLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8732
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
7
Undervalued
7
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3639
SMR RATING
1..100
1545
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4738
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8872
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CMTOY's Valuation (7) in the null industry is in the same range as HCMLF (7). This means that CMTOY’s stock grew similarly to HCMLF’s over the last 12 months.

CMTOY's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as HCMLF (39). This means that CMTOY’s stock grew similarly to HCMLF’s over the last 12 months.

CMTOY's SMR Rating (15) in the null industry is in the same range as HCMLF (45). This means that CMTOY’s stock grew similarly to HCMLF’s over the last 12 months.

HCMLF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as CMTOY (47). This means that HCMLF’s stock grew similarly to CMTOY’s over the last 12 months.

HCMLF's P/E Growth Rating (72) in the null industry is in the same range as CMTOY (88). This means that HCMLF’s stock grew similarly to CMTOY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMTOYHCMLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
46%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
40%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
61%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CMTOY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HCMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
FOREX / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NZDCNY4.25N/A
N/A
New Zealand Dollar - China Yuan
AZNIX12.16-0.02
-0.16%
Virtus Income & Growth Inst
DNLRX63.61-0.23
-0.36%
BNY Mellon Active MidCap I
ARIBX15.01-0.07
-0.46%
Aristotle Small Cap Eq I
NEFJX20.16-0.21
-1.03%
Natixis Vaughan Nelson Small Cap A

CMTOY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CMTOY and CBUMY have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CMTOY and CBUMY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMTOY
1D Price
Change %
CMTOY100%
N/A
CBUMY - CMTOY
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GCWOF - CMTOY
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CTXXF - CMTOY
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.20%
HCMLF - CMTOY
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HDLMY - CMTOY
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.25%
More

HCMLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HCMLF and HCMLY have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HCMLF and HCMLY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HCMLF
1D Price
Change %
HCMLF100%
N/A
HCMLY - HCMLF
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.06%
HDLMY - HCMLF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.25%
CBUMY - HCMLF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FRCEF - HCMLF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CMTOY - HCMLF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More