CMTOY
Price
$12.90
Change
+$1.06 (+8.95%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
1.03B
35 days until earnings call
GCWOF
Price
$8.76
Change
-$0.39 (-4.26%)
Updated
Apr 7 closing price
Capitalization
3.19B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CMTOY vs GCWOF

Header iconCMTOY vs GCWOF Comparison
Open Charts CMTOY vs GCWOFBanner chart's image
Cementos Argos S.A
Price$12.90
Change+$1.06 (+8.95%)
Volume$7.83K
Capitalization1.03B
Grupo Cementos de Chihuahua SAB de CV
Price$8.76
Change-$0.39 (-4.26%)
Volume$2.96K
Capitalization3.19B
CMTOY vs GCWOF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CMTOY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GCWOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMTOY vs. GCWOF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMTOY is a Hold and GCWOF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CMTOY: $12.90 vs. GCWOF: $8.76)
Brand notoriety: CMTOY and GCWOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMTOY: 1342% vs. GCWOF: 100%
Market capitalization -- CMTOY: $1.03B vs. GCWOF: $3.19B
CMTOY [@Construction Materials] is valued at $1.03B. GCWOF’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $3.19B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $59.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $8.92B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMTOY’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileGCWOF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CMTOY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • GCWOF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CMTOY is a better buy in the long-term than GCWOF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMTOY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GCWOF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMTOY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • GCWOF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CMTOY is a better buy in the short-term than GCWOF.

Price Growth

CMTOY (@Construction Materials) experienced а +8.95% price change this week, while GCWOF (@Construction Materials) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was +1.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.98%.

Reported Earning Dates

CMTOY is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (+1.65% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GCWOF($3.19B) has a higher market cap than CMTOY($1.03B). CMTOY has higher P/E ratio than GCWOF: CMTOY (31.25) vs GCWOF (12.33). CMTOY YTD gains are higher at: 7.928 vs. GCWOF (0.114). CMTOY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.39T vs. GCWOF (288M). CMTOY has higher revenues than GCWOF: CMTOY (12.49T) vs GCWOF (1.25B).
CMTOYGCWOFCMTOY / GCWOF
Capitalization1.03B3.19B32%
EBITDA1.39T288M483,333%
Gain YTD7.9280.1146,937%
P/E Ratio31.2512.33253%
Revenue12.49T1.25B999,840%
Total CashN/A770M-
Total DebtN/A516M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMTOY vs GCWOF: Fundamental Ratings
CMTOY
GCWOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
7
Undervalued
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3350
SMR RATING
1..100
1451
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4561
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8969
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CMTOY's Valuation (7) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GCWOF (72). This means that CMTOY’s stock grew somewhat faster than GCWOF’s over the last 12 months.

CMTOY's Profit vs Risk Rating (33) in the null industry is in the same range as GCWOF (50). This means that CMTOY’s stock grew similarly to GCWOF’s over the last 12 months.

CMTOY's SMR Rating (14) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GCWOF (51). This means that CMTOY’s stock grew somewhat faster than GCWOF’s over the last 12 months.

CMTOY's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as GCWOF (61). This means that CMTOY’s stock grew similarly to GCWOF’s over the last 12 months.

GCWOF's P/E Growth Rating (69) in the null industry is in the same range as CMTOY (89). This means that GCWOF’s stock grew similarly to CMTOY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMTOYGCWOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
59%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
51%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
30%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
31%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
68%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CMTOY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GCWOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VAFCX24.630.29
+1.19%
Invesco American Franchise C
GFVRX15.960.15
+0.95%
Goldman Sachs Focused Value R
PCMSX16.180.09
+0.56%
Principal MidCap Value I R6
PQIRX26.790.12
+0.45%
Victory Pioneer Equity Income R
RMYSX9.79N/A
N/A
Russell Inv Multi-Strategy Income S

CMTOY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CMTOY and CBUMY have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CMTOY and CBUMY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMTOY
1D Price
Change %
CMTOY100%
+8.95%
CBUMY - CMTOY
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GCWOF - CMTOY
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CTXXF - CMTOY
6%
Poorly correlated
+3.48%
HCMLF - CMTOY
5%
Poorly correlated
+2.09%
HDLMY - CMTOY
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.28%
More

GCWOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GCWOF and CTXXF have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GCWOF and CTXXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GCWOF
1D Price
Change %
GCWOF100%
N/A
CTXXF - GCWOF
8%
Poorly correlated
+3.48%
CMTOY - GCWOF
7%
Poorly correlated
+8.95%
HLBZF - GCWOF
7%
Poorly correlated
+6.18%
HCMLY - GCWOF
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.08%
HDLMY - GCWOF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.28%
More