It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CMTL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSATS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CMTL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SATS’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
CMTL (@Telecommunications Equipment) experienced а +9.82% price change this week, while SATS (@Telecommunications Equipment) price change was -2.53% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Telecommunications Equipment industry was -3.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +49.34%.
CMTL is expected to report earnings on Mar 06, 2025.
SATS is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2025.
The Telecommunications Equipment industry produces voice and data communications equipment, which includes fiber optic delivery products, digital signal processors, high-speed voice, data and video delivery. Additionally, satellite systems, global positioning systems, wireless data systems, personal communications equipment, telephone handsets and payload equipment for satellites also fall into this category. Apple Inc., QUALCOMM Incorporated and Nokia are major global players in this segment.
CMTL | SATS | CMTL / SATS | |
Capitalization | 93.8M | 3.87B | 2% |
EBITDA | 34.3M | -243.4M | -14% |
Gain YTD | -56.228 | 37.296 | -151% |
P/E Ratio | 153.85 | 11.76 | 1,309% |
Revenue | 571M | 17B | 3% |
Total Cash | 40M | 2.44B | 2% |
Total Debt | 209M | 25.9B | 1% |
CMTL | SATS | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 76 | 77 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 52 Fair valued | 39 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 93 | 94 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 45 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 91 | 29 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 4 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SATS's Valuation (39) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is in the same range as CMTL (52). This means that SATS’s stock grew similarly to CMTL’s over the last 12 months.
SATS's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is in the same range as CMTL (100). This means that SATS’s stock grew similarly to CMTL’s over the last 12 months.
CMTL's SMR Rating (93) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is in the same range as SATS (94). This means that CMTL’s stock grew similarly to SATS’s over the last 12 months.
SATS's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is in the same range as CMTL (51). This means that SATS’s stock grew similarly to CMTL’s over the last 12 months.
SATS's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMTL (91). This means that SATS’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMTL’s over the last 12 months.
CMTL | SATS | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago69% | 3 days ago71% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago72% | 3 days ago77% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago82% | 3 days ago76% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago70% | 3 days ago80% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago71% | 3 days ago75% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago69% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago84% | 5 days ago79% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago82% | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago66% | N/A |
A.I.dvisor tells us that CMTL and CRNT have been poorly correlated (+18% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CMTL and CRNT's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CMTL | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CMTL | 100% | +22.59% | ||
CRNT - CMTL | 18% Poorly correlated | +2.09% | ||
ZBRA - CMTL | 14% Poorly correlated | +1.99% | ||
VSAT - CMTL | 9% Poorly correlated | +2.45% | ||
CLRO - CMTL | 7% Poorly correlated | +0.41% | ||
SATS - CMTL | 7% Poorly correlated | +0.62% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SATS has been loosely correlated with SMOPF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SATS jumps, then SMOPF could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SATS | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
SATS | 100% | +0.62% | ||
SMOPF - SATS | 43% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
VSAT - SATS | 26% Poorly correlated | +2.45% | ||
CLFD - SATS | 26% Poorly correlated | -1.25% | ||
KN - SATS | 25% Poorly correlated | -0.72% | ||
UI - SATS | 23% Poorly correlated | +2.48% | ||
More |