Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMTFX vs PRGTX
CMTFX vs PRGTX Comparison
Open Charts CMTFX vs PRGTX
Columbia Global Technology Growth Inst
Price$115.59
Change+$0.05 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.61B
T. Rowe Price Global Technology
Price$27.04
Change+$0.08 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.82B
CMTFX vs PRGTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMTFX vs. PRGTX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMTFX is a Hold and PRGTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PRGTX has more cash in the bank: 5.82B vs. CMTFX (4.61B). CMTFX (0.00) and PRGTX (0.00) have matching dividends . CMTFX was incepted earlier than PRGTX: CMTFX (25 years) vs PRGTX (25 years). CMTFX (0.92) and PRGTX (0.92) have similar cost to investors . PRGTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.40 vs. CMTFX (7.00). CMTFX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRGTX: CMTFX (2000) vs PRGTX (2500). PRGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.64 vs. CMTFX (24.96). CMTFX return over 5 years is better than : 105.75 vs. PRGTX (9.08).
| CMTFX | PRGTX | CMTFX / PRGTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.92 | 100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.92 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 26.300 | 29.626 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.61B | 5.82B | 79% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.96 | 28.64 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 127.23 | 139.72 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 105.75 | 9.08 | 1,165% |
| Returns for 10 years | 475.65 | 88.96 | 535% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement