Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMTFX vs FSPTX
CMTFX vs FSPTX Comparison
Open Charts CMTFX vs FSPTX
Columbia Global Technology Growth Inst
Price$112.27
Change+$0.26 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.57B
Fidelity Select Technology
Price$42.05
Change-$0.03 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.99B
CMTFX vs FSPTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMTFX vs. FSPTX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMTFX is a StrongBuy and FSPTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPTX has more cash in the bank: 28B vs. CMTFX (4.57B). CMTFX (0.00) and FSPTX (0.00) have matching dividends . CMTFX was incepted earlier than FSPTX: CMTFX (25 years) vs FSPTX (44 years). CMTFX (0.92) is less costly to investors than FSPTX (0.62). FSPTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. CMTFX (6.00). FSPTX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMTFX: FSPTX (0) vs CMTFX (2000). CMTFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.44 vs. FSPTX (9.68). CMTFX return over 5 years is better than : 84.81 vs. FSPTX (57.34).
| CMTFX | FSPTX | CMTFX / FSPTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.62 | 148% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.62 | 148% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.673 | 14.018 | 162% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.57B | 28B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.44 | 9.68 | 191% |
| Returns for 3 years | 145.67 | 135.34 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 84.81 | 57.34 | 148% |
| Returns for 10 years | 453.60 | 253.19 | 179% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement