Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMTFX vs FSPTX
CMTFX vs FSPTX Comparison
Open Charts CMTFX vs FSPTX
Columbia Global Technology Growth Inst
Price$107.15
Change+$1.07 (+1.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.17B
Fidelity Select Technology
Price$40.53
Change+$0.33 (+0.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets18.18B
CMTFX vs FSPTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMTFX vs. FSPTX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMTFX is a Buy and FSPTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPTX has more cash in the bank: 18.2B vs. CMTFX (4.17B). CMTFX (0.00) and FSPTX (0.00) have matching dividends . CMTFX was incepted earlier than FSPTX: CMTFX (25 years) vs FSPTX (44 years). CMTFX (0.92) is less costly to investors than FSPTX (0.62). FSPTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. CMTFX (7.00). FSPTX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMTFX: FSPTX (0) vs CMTFX (2000). CMTFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 35.39 vs. FSPTX (23.77). CMTFX return over 5 years is better than : 104.80 vs. FSPTX (52.24).
| CMTFX | FSPTX | CMTFX / FSPTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.62 | 148% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.62 | 148% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.078 | 9.002 | 190% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.17B | 18.2B | 23% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 35.39 | 23.77 | 149% |
| Returns for 3 years | 100.54 | 100.43 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 104.80 | 52.24 | 201% |
| Returns for 10 years | 462.17 | 259.25 | 178% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers