Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMTFX vs FSELX
CMTFX vs FSELX Comparison
Open Charts CMTFX vs FSELX
Columbia Global Technology Growth Inst
Price$112.63
Change+$0.36 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.58B
Fidelity Select Semiconductors
Price$44.12
Change+$0.06 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets28.19B
CMTFX vs FSELX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMTFX vs. FSELX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMTFX is a StrongBuy and FSELX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSELX has more cash in the bank: 28.2B vs. CMTFX (4.58B). CMTFX (0.00) and FSELX (0.00) have matching dividends . CMTFX was incepted earlier than FSELX: CMTFX (25 years) vs FSELX (40 years). CMTFX (0.92) is less costly to investors than FSELX (0.62). FSELX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 59.00 vs. CMTFX (6.00). FSELX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMTFX: FSELX (0) vs CMTFX (2000). FSELX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.14 vs. CMTFX (18.87). FSELX return over 5 years is better than : 175.68 vs. CMTFX (85.40).
| CMTFX | FSELX | CMTFX / FSELX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.62 | 148% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.62 | 148% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 40 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.066 | 31.640 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.58B | 28.2B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.87 | 26.14 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 149.29 | 208.41 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 85.40 | 175.68 | 49% |
| Returns for 10 years | 448.61 | 479.38 | 94% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers