CMTDF
Price
$28.45
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 1 closing price
Capitalization
13.45B
FSGB
Price
$9.50
Change
-$0.15 (-1.55%)
Updated
May 30 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

CMTDF vs FSGB

Header iconCMTDF vs FSGB Comparison
Open Charts CMTDF vs FSGBBanner chart's image
Sumitomo Mitsui Trust Group
Price$28.45
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$250
Capitalization13.45B
First Federal of South Carolina Federal Savings Bank
Price$9.50
Change-$0.15 (-1.55%)
Volume$400
CapitalizationN/A
CMTDF vs FSGB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CMTDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FSGB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMTDF vs. FSGB commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMTDF is a Hold and FSGB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CMTDF: $28.45 vs. FSGB: $9.50)
Brand notoriety: CMTDF and FSGB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMTDF: 27% vs. FSGB: 152%
Market capitalization -- CMTDF: $13.45B vs. FSGB: $0
CMTDF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $13.45B. FSGB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMTDF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFSGB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CMTDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FSGB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CMTDF is a better buy in the long-term than FSGB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMTDF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FSGB’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMTDF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • FSGB’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CMTDF is a better buy in the short-term than FSGB.

Price Growth

CMTDF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FSGB (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.71%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.86% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMTDF YTD gains are higher at: 29.607 vs. FSGB (-1.042).
CMTDFFSGBCMTDF / FSGB
Capitalization13.5BN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD29.607-1.042-2,842%
P/E Ratio10.76N/A-
Revenue1.14TN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMTDF vs FSGB: Fundamental Ratings
CMTDF
FSGB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
52
Fair valued
28
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
47100
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4875
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9896
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FSGB's Valuation (28) in the null industry is in the same range as CMTDF (52). This means that FSGB’s stock grew similarly to CMTDF’s over the last 12 months.

CMTDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (47) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FSGB (100). This means that CMTDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FSGB’s over the last 12 months.

CMTDF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as FSGB (100). This means that CMTDF’s stock grew similarly to FSGB’s over the last 12 months.

CMTDF's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as FSGB (75). This means that CMTDF’s stock grew similarly to FSGB’s over the last 12 months.

FSGB's P/E Growth Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as CMTDF (98). This means that FSGB’s stock grew similarly to CMTDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMTDFFSGB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
42%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
30%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
31%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
19%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
19%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
40%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
34%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CMTDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FSGB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SFNC20.340.30
+1.50%
Simmons First National Corp
IIIV29.000.41
+1.43%
i3 Verticals
XNET4.55N/A
N/A
Xunlei Limited
UAVS1.09-0.01
-0.91%
AgEagle Aerial Systems
KMX70.61-0.96
-1.34%
CarMax

CMTDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMTDF has been loosely correlated with FSGB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CMTDF jumps, then FSGB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMTDF
1D Price
Change %
CMTDF100%
N/A
FSGB - CMTDF
47%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BPIRF - CMTDF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FRAF - CMTDF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.82%
AMBK - CMTDF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FCBC - CMTDF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.93%
More

FSGB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSGB has been loosely correlated with APLO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FSGB jumps, then APLO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSGB
1D Price
Change %
FSGB100%
N/A
APLO - FSGB
51%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CMTDF - FSGB
47%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ANDC - FSGB
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FRAF - FSGB
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.82%
CTYP - FSGB
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More