CMTDF
Price
$28.64
Change
-$0.09 (-0.31%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
20.14B
FCBC
Price
$37.56
Change
-$0.52 (-1.37%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
687.91M
51 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CMTDF vs FCBC

Header iconCMTDF vs FCBC Comparison
Open Charts CMTDF vs FCBCBanner chart's image
Sumitomo Mitsui Trust Group
Price$28.64
Change-$0.09 (-0.31%)
Volume$100
Capitalization20.14B
First Community Bankshares
Price$37.56
Change-$0.52 (-1.37%)
Volume$55.89K
Capitalization687.91M
CMTDF vs FCBC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CMTDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FCBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMTDF vs. FCBC commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMTDF is a Hold and FCBC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CMTDF: $28.64 vs. FCBC: $37.56)
Brand notoriety: CMTDF and FCBC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMTDF: 10% vs. FCBC: 128%
Market capitalization -- CMTDF: $20.14B vs. FCBC: $687.91M
CMTDF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $20.14B. FCBC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $687.91M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMTDF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFCBC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CMTDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FCBC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FCBC is a better buy in the long-term than CMTDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMTDF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FCBC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMTDF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • FCBC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CMTDF is a better buy in the short-term than FCBC.

Price Growth

CMTDF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FCBC (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.11% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.09%.

Reported Earning Dates

FCBC is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.38% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMTDF($20.1B) has a higher market cap than FCBC($688M). FCBC has higher P/E ratio than CMTDF: FCBC (13.81) vs CMTDF (10.74). CMTDF YTD gains are higher at: 30.450 vs. FCBC (-3.035). FCBC has less debt than CMTDF: FCBC (1M) vs CMTDF (17.15T).
CMTDFFCBCCMTDF / FCBC
Capitalization20.1B688M2,922%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD30.450-3.035-1,003%
P/E Ratio10.7413.8178%
Revenue1.23TN/A-
Total CashN/A92.4M-
Total Debt17.15T1M1,714,500,000%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMTDF vs FCBC: Fundamental Ratings
CMTDF
FCBC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5080
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
82
Overvalued
55
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5029
SMR RATING
1..100
10040
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4756
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9461
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FCBC's Valuation (55) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CMTDF (82) in the null industry. This means that FCBC’s stock grew similarly to CMTDF’s over the last 12 months.

FCBC's Profit vs Risk Rating (29) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CMTDF (50) in the null industry. This means that FCBC’s stock grew similarly to CMTDF’s over the last 12 months.

FCBC's SMR Rating (40) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMTDF (100) in the null industry. This means that FCBC’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMTDF’s over the last 12 months.

CMTDF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as FCBC (56) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CMTDF’s stock grew similarly to FCBC’s over the last 12 months.

FCBC's P/E Growth Rating (61) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMTDF (94) in the null industry. This means that FCBC’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMTDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMTDFFCBC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
34%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
28%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CMTDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FCBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
POOL333.0917.29
+5.47%
Pool Corp
TRIB1.160.01
+0.87%
Trinity Biotech plc
ACNB44.91-0.59
-1.30%
ACNB Corp
SHOT0.39-0.01
-3.13%
Safety Shot
UPWK16.19-0.59
-3.52%
Upwork

CMTDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMTDF has been loosely correlated with FSGB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CMTDF jumps, then FSGB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMTDF
1D Price
Change %
CMTDF100%
N/A
FSGB - CMTDF
47%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BPIRF - CMTDF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FRAF - CMTDF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.49%
AMBK - CMTDF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.32%
FCBC - CMTDF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.37%
More

FCBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCBC has been closely correlated with MCBS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FCBC jumps, then MCBS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FCBC
1D Price
Change %
FCBC100%
-1.37%
MCBS - FCBC
87%
Closely correlated
-1.50%
SMBC - FCBC
86%
Closely correlated
-1.32%
PRK - FCBC
86%
Closely correlated
-0.69%
IBCP - FCBC
86%
Closely correlated
-0.79%
TRMK - FCBC
85%
Closely correlated
-1.30%
More