CMTDF
Price
$28.70
Change
+$2.50 (+9.54%)
Updated
Dec 3 closing price
Capitalization
21.28B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CNAF
Price
$7.63
Change
+$0.02 (+0.26%)
Updated
Dec 23 closing price
Capitalization
21.81M
39 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CMTDF vs CNAF

Header iconCMTDF vs CNAF Comparison
Open Charts CMTDF vs CNAFBanner chart's image
Sumitomo Mitsui Trust Group
Price$28.70
Change+$2.50 (+9.54%)
Volume$140
Capitalization21.28B
Commercial National Financial Corp. (PA)
Price$7.63
Change+$0.02 (+0.26%)
Volume$1.25K
Capitalization21.81M
CMTDF vs CNAF Comparison Chart in %
CMTDF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CNAF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMTDF vs. CNAF commentary
Dec 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMTDF is a Buy and CNAF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 25, 2025
Stock price -- (CMTDF: $28.70 vs. CNAF: $7.63)
Brand notoriety: CMTDF and CNAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMTDF: 31% vs. CNAF: 31%
Market capitalization -- CMTDF: $21.28B vs. CNAF: $21.81M
CMTDF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $21.28B. CNAF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $21.81M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $171.46B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.64B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMTDF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCNAF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CMTDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CNAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CNAF is a better buy in the long-term than CMTDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMTDF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CNAF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMTDF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • CNAF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CMTDF is a better buy in the short-term than CNAF.

Price Growth

CMTDF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CNAF (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.52% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.56%.

Reported Earning Dates

CNAF is expected to report earnings on Feb 02, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.01% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMTDF($21.3B) has a higher market cap than CNAF($21.8M). CNAF has higher P/E ratio than CMTDF: CNAF (12.93) vs CMTDF (10.74). CMTDF YTD gains are higher at: 30.746 vs. CNAF (18.340). CNAF has less debt than CMTDF: CNAF (28.7M) vs CMTDF (18.72T). CMTDF has higher revenues than CNAF: CMTDF (1.57T) vs CNAF (14.6M).
CMTDFCNAFCMTDF / CNAF
Capitalization21.3B21.8M97,706%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD30.74618.340168%
P/E Ratio10.7412.9383%
Revenue1.57T14.6M10,732,877%
Total CashN/A6.72M-
Total Debt18.72T28.7M65,216,028%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMTDF vs CNAF: Fundamental Ratings
CMTDF
CNAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4860
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
77
Overvalued
31
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
54100
SMR RATING
1..100
10081
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4755
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8244
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
90n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CNAF's Valuation (31) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMTDF (77). This means that CNAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMTDF’s over the last 12 months.

CMTDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (54) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CNAF (100). This means that CMTDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CNAF’s over the last 12 months.

CNAF's SMR Rating (81) in the null industry is in the same range as CMTDF (100). This means that CNAF’s stock grew similarly to CMTDF’s over the last 12 months.

CMTDF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as CNAF (55). This means that CMTDF’s stock grew similarly to CNAF’s over the last 12 months.

CNAF's P/E Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMTDF (82). This means that CNAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMTDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMTDFCNAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
51%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
45%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CMTDF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CNAF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DFAU47.440.14
+0.30%
Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF
VTG76.190.16
+0.22%
Vanguard Total Treasury ETF
MAMB24.080.04
+0.16%
Monarch Ambassador Income ETF
TPHE26.16N/A
N/A
Timothy Plan High Dividend Stock Enhanced ETF
MLN17.66-0.02
-0.11%
VanEck Long Muni ETF

CMTDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMTDF has been loosely correlated with CAIB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CMTDF jumps, then CAIB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMTDF
1D Price
Change %
CMTDF100%
N/A
CAIB - CMTDF
41%
Loosely correlated
N/A
FLG - CMTDF
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.39%
BPIRF - CMTDF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ASCN - CMTDF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BLHK - CMTDF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CNAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CNAF and CMTDF have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CNAF and CMTDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CNAF
1D Price
Change %
CNAF100%
N/A
CMTDF - CNAF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CIXPF - CNAF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CMAKY - CNAF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CNBB - CNAF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CKHGY - CNAF
4%
Poorly correlated
+2.87%
More