CMTDF
Price
$28.00
Change
+$1.44 (+5.42%)
Updated
Jul 18 closing price
Capitalization
13.45B
CMTV
Price
$21.00
Change
+$0.25 (+1.20%)
Updated
Jul 23 closing price
Capitalization
100.88M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CMTDF vs CMTV

Header iconCMTDF vs CMTV Comparison
Open Charts CMTDF vs CMTVBanner chart's image
Sumitomo Mitsui Trust Group
Price$28.00
Change+$1.44 (+5.42%)
Volume$100
Capitalization13.45B
Community Ban
Price$21.00
Change+$0.25 (+1.20%)
Volume$2.02K
Capitalization100.88M
CMTDF vs CMTV Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CMTDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CMTV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMTDF vs. CMTV commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMTDF is a Hold and CMTV is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (CMTDF: $28.00 vs. CMTV: $21.00)
Brand notoriety: CMTDF and CMTV are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMTDF: 25% vs. CMTV: 49%
Market capitalization -- CMTDF: $13.45B vs. CMTV: $100.88M
CMTDF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $13.45B. CMTV’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $100.88M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMTDF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCMTV’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CMTDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CMTV’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CMTV is a better buy in the long-term than CMTDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMTDF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CMTV’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMTDF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • CMTV’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CMTDF is a better buy in the short-term than CMTV.

Price Growth

CMTDF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CMTV (@Regional Banks) price change was +3.70% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.19%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.51% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMTDF($13.5B) has a higher market cap than CMTV($101M). CMTDF has higher P/E ratio than CMTV: CMTDF (10.76) vs CMTV (6.64). CMTV YTD gains are higher at: 30.941 vs. CMTDF (27.557). CMTDF has higher revenues than CMTV: CMTDF (1.14T) vs CMTV (39.3M).
CMTDFCMTVCMTDF / CMTV
Capitalization13.5B101M13,366%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD27.55730.94189%
P/E Ratio10.766.64162%
Revenue1.14T39.3M2,903,308%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A14.2M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMTDF vs CMTV: Fundamental Ratings
CMTDF
CMTV
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5045
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
53
Fair valued
56
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5130
SMR RATING
1..100
10043
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5042
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9723
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CMTDF's Valuation (53) in the null industry is in the same range as CMTV (56). This means that CMTDF’s stock grew similarly to CMTV’s over the last 12 months.

CMTV's Profit vs Risk Rating (30) in the null industry is in the same range as CMTDF (51). This means that CMTV’s stock grew similarly to CMTDF’s over the last 12 months.

CMTV's SMR Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMTDF (100). This means that CMTV’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMTDF’s over the last 12 months.

CMTV's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as CMTDF (50). This means that CMTV’s stock grew similarly to CMTDF’s over the last 12 months.

CMTV's P/E Growth Rating (23) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CMTDF (97). This means that CMTV’s stock grew significantly faster than CMTDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMTDFCMTV
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
24%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
56%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CMTDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CMTV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ZVNIX43.430.38
+0.88%
Zevenbergen Growth Institutional
RSEFX14.790.06
+0.41%
Royce Small-Cap Special Equity Svc
ISMVX10.750.04
+0.37%
William Blair Small-Mid Cap Value I
MXIVX15.280.01
+0.07%
Empower International Value Inv
JIERX22.50-0.06
-0.27%
JPMorgan International Equity R5

CMTDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMTDF has been loosely correlated with FSGB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CMTDF jumps, then FSGB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMTDF
1D Price
Change %
CMTDF100%
N/A
FSGB - CMTDF
47%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BPIRF - CMTDF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FRAF - CMTDF
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.82%
AMBK - CMTDF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FCBC - CMTDF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.11%
More

CMTV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CMTV and MBLU have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CMTV and MBLU's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMTV
1D Price
Change %
CMTV100%
N/A
MBLU - CMTV
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CMTDF - CMTV
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CIHKY - CMTV
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.68%
CIWV - CMTV
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CNBB - CMTV
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More