CMT
Price
$17.30
Change
+$0.06 (+0.35%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
163.85M
37 days until earnings call
FUL
Price
$62.24
Change
-$0.75 (-1.19%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
4.35B
73 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CMT vs FUL

Header iconCMT vs FUL Comparison
Open Charts CMT vs FULBanner chart's image
Core Molding Technologies
Price$17.30
Change+$0.06 (+0.35%)
Volume$14.74K
Capitalization163.85M
HB Fuller
Price$62.24
Change-$0.75 (-1.19%)
Volume$250.44K
Capitalization4.35B
CMT vs FUL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CMT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FUL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMT vs. FUL commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMT is a Buy and FUL is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CMT: $17.30 vs. FUL: $62.24)
Brand notoriety: CMT and FUL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Specialty industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMT: 41% vs. FUL: 63%
Market capitalization -- CMT: $163.85M vs. FUL: $4.35B
CMT [@Chemicals: Specialty] is valued at $163.85M. FUL’s [@Chemicals: Specialty] market capitalization is $4.35B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry ranges from $223.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry is $9.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFUL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CMT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FUL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FUL is a better buy in the long-term than CMT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FUL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FUL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CMT and FUL are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CMT (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а +0.82% price change this week, while FUL (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was +0.40% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was +3.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.72%.

Reported Earning Dates

CMT is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2025.

FUL is expected to report earnings on Sep 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Specialty (+3.00% weekly)

The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FUL($4.35B) has a higher market cap than CMT($164M). FUL has higher P/E ratio than CMT: FUL (28.70) vs CMT (8.07). CMT YTD gains are higher at: 4.595 vs. FUL (-7.025). FUL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 540M vs. CMT (39.7M). FUL has more cash in the bank: 165M vs. CMT (24.1M). CMT has less debt than FUL: CMT (23M) vs FUL (1.83B). FUL has higher revenues than CMT: FUL (3.51B) vs CMT (358M).
CMTFULCMT / FUL
Capitalization164M4.35B4%
EBITDA39.7M540M7%
Gain YTD4.595-7.025-65%
P/E Ratio8.0728.7028%
Revenue358M3.51B10%
Total Cash24.1M165M15%
Total Debt23M1.83B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMT vs FUL: Fundamental Ratings
CMT
FUL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
70
Overvalued
56
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5159
SMR RATING
1..100
7680
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4950
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1325
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FUL's Valuation (56) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as CMT (70) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that FUL’s stock grew similarly to CMT’s over the last 12 months.

CMT's Profit vs Risk Rating (51) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as FUL (59) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that CMT’s stock grew similarly to FUL’s over the last 12 months.

CMT's SMR Rating (76) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as FUL (80) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that CMT’s stock grew similarly to FUL’s over the last 12 months.

CMT's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as FUL (50) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that CMT’s stock grew similarly to FUL’s over the last 12 months.

CMT's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as FUL (25) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that CMT’s stock grew similarly to FUL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMTFUL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
55%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CMT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FUL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DCSVX11.400.09
+0.80%
Dunham Small Cap Value C
FSWFX73.500.43
+0.59%
American Funds SMALLCAP World 529-F-2
MNCSX12.500.06
+0.48%
Mercer Non-US Core Equity I
DVLIX31.360.14
+0.45%
BNY Mellon Opportunistic Midcap Value I
OANGX36.630.01
+0.03%
Oakmark Global Institutional

CMT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMT has been loosely correlated with IOSP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CMT jumps, then IOSP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMT
1D Price
Change %
CMT100%
+0.35%
IOSP - CMT
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.67%
ALTO - CMT
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.81%
CBT - CMT
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.71%
RPM - CMT
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.21%
FUL - CMT
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.45%
More

FUL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FUL has been closely correlated with SCL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FUL jumps, then SCL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FUL
1D Price
Change %
FUL100%
+0.45%
SCL - FUL
71%
Closely correlated
+0.75%
RPM - FUL
70%
Closely correlated
+0.21%
KWR - FUL
70%
Closely correlated
+0.77%
AVNT - FUL
69%
Closely correlated
+0.03%
PPG - FUL
67%
Closely correlated
-0.26%
More