CMSQY
Price
$24.40
Change
-$0.07 (-0.29%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
14.13B
PIPR
Price
$327.39
Change
-$4.12 (-1.24%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
5.79B
46 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CMSQY vs PIPR

Header iconCMSQY vs PIPR Comparison
Open Charts CMSQY vs PIPRBanner chart's image
Computershare
Price$24.40
Change-$0.07 (-0.29%)
Volume$49.37K
Capitalization14.13B
Piper Sandler Companies
Price$327.39
Change-$4.12 (-1.24%)
Volume$94.42K
Capitalization5.79B
CMSQY vs PIPR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CMSQY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PIPR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMSQY vs. PIPR commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMSQY is a Buy and PIPR is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (CMSQY: $24.40 vs. PIPR: $327.39)
Brand notoriety: CMSQY and PIPR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMSQY: 332% vs. PIPR: 64%
Market capitalization -- CMSQY: $14.13B vs. PIPR: $5.79B
CMSQY [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $14.13B. PIPR’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $5.79B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMSQY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePIPR’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CMSQY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PIPR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PIPR is a better buy in the long-term than CMSQY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMSQY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PIPR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMSQY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • PIPR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PIPR is a better buy in the short-term than CMSQY.

Price Growth

CMSQY (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -2.20% price change this week, while PIPR (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -1.92% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +0.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +41.22%.

Reported Earning Dates

PIPR is expected to report earnings on Oct 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+0.73% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMSQY($14.1B) has a higher market cap than PIPR($5.79B). PIPR has higher P/E ratio than CMSQY: PIPR (27.58) vs CMSQY (23.72). CMSQY YTD gains are higher at: 20.518 vs. PIPR (11.088). PIPR has less debt than CMSQY: PIPR (116M) vs CMSQY (1.74B).
CMSQYPIPRCMSQY / PIPR
Capitalization14.1B5.79B243%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD20.51811.088185%
P/E Ratio23.7227.5886%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total Cash441MN/A-
Total Debt1.74B116M1,501%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMSQY vs PIPR: Fundamental Ratings
CMSQY
PIPR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5064
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
30
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1621
SMR RATING
1..100
4943
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6044
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5478
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
1050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CMSQY's Valuation (27) in the null industry is in the same range as PIPR (30). This means that CMSQY’s stock grew similarly to PIPR’s over the last 12 months.

CMSQY's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the null industry is in the same range as PIPR (21). This means that CMSQY’s stock grew similarly to PIPR’s over the last 12 months.

PIPR's SMR Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as CMSQY (49). This means that PIPR’s stock grew similarly to CMSQY’s over the last 12 months.

PIPR's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as CMSQY (60). This means that PIPR’s stock grew similarly to CMSQY’s over the last 12 months.

CMSQY's P/E Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as PIPR (78). This means that CMSQY’s stock grew similarly to PIPR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMSQYPIPR
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 28 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CMSQY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PIPR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AGH3.710.51
+15.94%
Aureus Greenway Holdings Inc
TASK18.180.19
+1.06%
TaskUs
ARTNA33.240.33
+0.99%
Artesian Resources Corp
INGR128.410.48
+0.38%
Ingredion
ECCF25.25-0.11
-0.43%
Eagle Point Credit Company

CMSQY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CMSQY and ASXFY have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CMSQY and ASXFY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMSQY
1D Price
Change %
CMSQY100%
-0.29%
ASXFY - CMSQY
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.20%
GS - CMSQY
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.43%
EVR - CMSQY
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.20%
PIPR - CMSQY
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.24%
PJT - CMSQY
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.09%
More

PIPR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PIPR has been closely correlated with EVR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PIPR jumps, then EVR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PIPR
1D Price
Change %
PIPR100%
-1.24%
EVR - PIPR
90%
Closely correlated
+0.20%
MC - PIPR
89%
Closely correlated
-1.46%
SF - PIPR
87%
Closely correlated
-2.71%
GS - PIPR
86%
Closely correlated
-1.43%
JEF - PIPR
84%
Closely correlated
-2.26%
More