CMSQY
Price
$26.52
Change
-$1.10 (-3.98%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
10.1B
DBOEF
Price
$255.50
Change
-$3.71 (-1.43%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
35.3B
Ad is loading...

CMSQY vs DBOEF

Header iconCMSQY vs DBOEF Comparison
Open Charts CMSQY vs DBOEFBanner chart's image
Computershare
Price$26.52
Change-$1.10 (-3.98%)
Volume$9.57K
Capitalization10.1B
Deutsche Boerse AG
Price$255.50
Change-$3.71 (-1.43%)
Volume$25
Capitalization35.3B
CMSQY vs DBOEF Comparison Chart
Loading...
CMSQY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMSQY vs. DBOEF commentary
Feb 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMSQY is a StrongBuy and DBOEF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 23, 2025
Stock price -- (CMSQY: $27.03 vs. DBOEF: $258.27)
Brand notoriety: CMSQY and DBOEF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMSQY: 31% vs. DBOEF: 3%
Market capitalization -- CMSQY: $10.1B vs. DBOEF: $35.3B
CMSQY [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $10.1B. DBOEF’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $35.3B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $11.6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMSQY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileDBOEF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CMSQY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • DBOEF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, DBOEF is a better buy in the long-term than CMSQY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMSQY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CMSQY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

CMSQY (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +18.24% price change this week, while DBOEF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +0.94% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -1.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +32.73%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-1.21% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DBOEF($35.3B) has a higher market cap than CMSQY($10.1B). CMSQY has higher P/E ratio than DBOEF: CMSQY (32.15) vs DBOEF (18.94). CMSQY YTD gains are higher at: 28.806 vs. DBOEF (9.311). DBOEF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.78B vs. CMSQY (825M). DBOEF has more cash in the bank: 209B vs. CMSQY (1.08B). CMSQY has less debt than DBOEF: CMSQY (2.77B) vs DBOEF (6.32B). DBOEF has higher revenues than CMSQY: DBOEF (5.68B) vs CMSQY (2.9B).
CMSQYDBOEFCMSQY / DBOEF
Capitalization10.1B35.3B29%
EBITDA825M2.78B30%
Gain YTD28.8069.311309%
P/E Ratio32.1518.94170%
Revenue2.9B5.68B51%
Total Cash1.08B209B1%
Total Debt2.77B6.32B44%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMSQY vs DBOEF: Fundamental Ratings
CMSQY
DBOEF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1114
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
95
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
722
SMR RATING
1..100
9048
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3743
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3133
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CMSQY's Valuation (67) in the null industry is in the same range as DBOEF (95). This means that CMSQY’s stock grew similarly to DBOEF’s over the last 12 months.

CMSQY's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the null industry is in the same range as DBOEF (22). This means that CMSQY’s stock grew similarly to DBOEF’s over the last 12 months.

DBOEF's SMR Rating (48) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMSQY (90). This means that DBOEF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMSQY’s over the last 12 months.

CMSQY's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as DBOEF (43). This means that CMSQY’s stock grew similarly to DBOEF’s over the last 12 months.

CMSQY's P/E Growth Rating (31) in the null industry is in the same range as DBOEF (33). This means that CMSQY’s stock grew similarly to DBOEF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMSQY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
53%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
49%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CMSQY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPY611.491.79
+0.29%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
AAPL244.47-0.13
-0.05%
Apple
GME26.97-0.03
-0.11%
GameStop Corp
BTC.X95539.550000-233.835940
-0.24%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA354.11-1.73
-0.49%
Tesla

CMSQY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CMSQY and ASXFY have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CMSQY and ASXFY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMSQY
1D Price
Change %
CMSQY100%
-2.07%
ASXFY - CMSQY
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.69%
GS - CMSQY
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.76%
EVR - CMSQY
28%
Poorly correlated
+2.27%
PIPR - CMSQY
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.18%
PJT - CMSQY
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.83%
More

DBOEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DBOEF has been loosely correlated with DBOEY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DBOEF jumps, then DBOEY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DBOEF
1D Price
Change %
DBOEF100%
+2.29%
DBOEY - DBOEF
54%
Loosely correlated
+1.09%
LDNXF - DBOEF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.08%
CMSQY - DBOEF
5%
Poorly correlated
-2.07%
CLPE - DBOEF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CIIHF - DBOEF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More