CMS
Price
$72.53
Change
-$0.37 (-0.51%)
Updated
Apr 21, 10:52 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
17.91B
3 days until earnings call
RDEIF
Price
$17.36
Change
-$0.12 (-0.69%)
Updated
Feb 25 closing price
Capitalization
9.04B
Ad is loading...

CMS vs RDEIF

Header iconCMS vs RDEIF Comparison
Open Charts CMS vs RDEIFBanner chart's image
CMS Energy
Price$72.53
Change-$0.37 (-0.51%)
Volume$1.4K
Capitalization17.91B
Redeia Corporacion SA
Price$17.36
Change-$0.12 (-0.69%)
Volume$639
Capitalization9.04B
CMS vs RDEIF Comparison Chart
Loading...
CMS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMS vs. RDEIF commentary
Apr 21, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMS is a Hold and RDEIF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 21, 2025
Stock price -- (CMS: $72.91 vs. RDEIF: $17.36)
Brand notoriety: CMS and RDEIF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electric Utilities industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMS: 84% vs. RDEIF: 119%
Market capitalization -- CMS: $17.91B vs. RDEIF: $9.04B
CMS [@Electric Utilities] is valued at $17.91B. RDEIF’s [@Electric Utilities] market capitalization is $9.04B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electric Utilities] industry ranges from $131.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electric Utilities] industry is $18.5B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRDEIF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CMS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RDEIF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CMS is a better buy in the long-term than RDEIF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CMS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

CMS (@Electric Utilities) experienced а +1.90% price change this week, while RDEIF (@Electric Utilities) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electric Utilities industry was +3.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.84%.

Reported Earning Dates

CMS is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electric Utilities (+3.21% weekly)

Electric utilities companies generate, transmit and distribute electricity to businesses/offices and residences. Companies may be owned by the government or investors or public shareholders, or a combination thereof. The industry also includes firms that buy and sell electricity. Companies in this industry typically require significant investments in infrastructure. Many firms in this industry pay substantial and regular dividends to shareholders. However, changes in interest rates (and their impact on debt burdens), natural disasters and changing commodity prices could be factors affecting energy utilities’ profit margins. NextEra Energy, Inc., Duke Energy Corporation, Dominion Energy Inc. and Southern Company are among U.S. electric utilities companies with the largest market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMS($17.9B) has a higher market cap than RDEIF($9.04B). CMS has higher P/E ratio than RDEIF: CMS (19.93) vs RDEIF (12.89). CMS YTD gains are higher at: 10.249 vs. RDEIF (2.966). CMS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.78B vs. RDEIF (1.53B). RDEIF has more cash in the bank: 1.55B vs. CMS (227M). RDEIF has less debt than CMS: RDEIF (6.24B) vs CMS (15.6B). CMS has higher revenues than RDEIF: CMS (7.46B) vs RDEIF (2.02B).
CMSRDEIFCMS / RDEIF
Capitalization17.9B9.04B198%
EBITDA2.78B1.53B181%
Gain YTD10.2492.966346%
P/E Ratio19.9312.89155%
Revenue7.46B2.02B370%
Total Cash227M1.55B15%
Total Debt15.6B6.24B250%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMS vs RDEIF: Fundamental Ratings
CMS
RDEIF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
74
Overvalued
59
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
23100
SMR RATING
1..100
5979
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4552
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3324
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RDEIF's Valuation (59) in the null industry is in the same range as CMS (74) in the Electric Utilities industry. This means that RDEIF’s stock grew similarly to CMS’s over the last 12 months.

CMS's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the Electric Utilities industry is significantly better than the same rating for RDEIF (100) in the null industry. This means that CMS’s stock grew significantly faster than RDEIF’s over the last 12 months.

CMS's SMR Rating (59) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as RDEIF (79) in the null industry. This means that CMS’s stock grew similarly to RDEIF’s over the last 12 months.

CMS's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as RDEIF (52) in the null industry. This means that CMS’s stock grew similarly to RDEIF’s over the last 12 months.

RDEIF's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the null industry is in the same range as CMS (33) in the Electric Utilities industry. This means that RDEIF’s stock grew similarly to CMS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
53%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
43%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
43%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
53%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
43%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CMS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME26.780.53
+2.02%
GameStop Corp
AAPL196.982.71
+1.39%
Apple
SPY526.410.75
+0.14%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
BTC.X85174.305000110.898440
+0.13%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA241.37-0.18
-0.07%
Tesla

CMS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMS has been closely correlated with DTE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CMS jumps, then DTE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMS
1D Price
Change %
CMS100%
+1.03%
DTE - CMS
85%
Closely correlated
+1.16%
WEC - CMS
84%
Closely correlated
+0.96%
LNT - CMS
82%
Closely correlated
+0.63%
ED - CMS
80%
Closely correlated
+0.59%
PPL - CMS
80%
Closely correlated
+1.25%
More

RDEIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RDEIF and ED have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RDEIF and ED's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RDEIF
1D Price
Change %
RDEIF100%
N/A
ED - RDEIF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.59%
OGE - RDEIF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.89%
PEG - RDEIF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.40%
CMS - RDEIF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.03%
WEC - RDEIF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.96%
More