CMRZF
Price
$0.09
Change
-$0.03 (-25.00%)
Updated
Nov 4 closing price
Capitalization
24.13M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
LGO
Price
$1.03
Change
+$0.02 (+1.98%)
Updated
Dec 26 closing price
Capitalization
84M
83 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CMRZF vs LGO

Header iconCMRZF vs LGO Comparison
Open Charts CMRZF vs LGOBanner chart's image
Commerce Resources
Price$0.09
Change-$0.03 (-25.00%)
Volume$6.14K
Capitalization24.13M
Largo
Price$1.03
Change+$0.02 (+1.98%)
Volume$718.58K
Capitalization84M
CMRZF vs LGO Comparison Chart in %
CMRZF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
LGO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMRZF vs. LGO commentary
Dec 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMRZF is a StrongBuy and LGO is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 27, 2025
Stock price -- (CMRZF: $0.09 vs. LGO: $1.03)
Brand notoriety: CMRZF and LGO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMRZF: 15% vs. LGO: 110%
Market capitalization -- CMRZF: $24.13M vs. LGO: $84M
CMRZF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $24.13M. LGO’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $84M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.07B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMRZF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLGO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CMRZF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LGO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CMRZF is a better buy in the long-term than LGO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMRZF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LGO’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMRZF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • LGO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LGO is a better buy in the short-term than CMRZF.

Price Growth

CMRZF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while LGO (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +10.07% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +8.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +18.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was +64.94%.

Reported Earning Dates

LGO is expected to report earnings on Mar 20, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+8.93% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LGO($84M) has a higher market cap than CMRZF($24.1M). CMRZF YTD gains are higher at: 67.249 vs. LGO (-39.826). CMRZF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -3.05M vs. LGO (-13.83M). LGO has more cash in the bank: 7.85M vs. CMRZF (653K). CMRZF has less debt than LGO: CMRZF (2.2M) vs LGO (106M). LGO has higher revenues than CMRZF: LGO (112M) vs CMRZF (0).
CMRZFLGOCMRZF / LGO
Capitalization24.1M84M29%
EBITDA-3.05M-13.83M22%
Gain YTD67.249-39.826-169%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue0112M-
Total Cash653K7.85M8%
Total Debt2.2M106M2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMRZF vs LGO: Fundamental Ratings
CMRZF
LGO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4222
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
61
Fair valued
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9297
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4264
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10099
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
1490

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CMRZF's Valuation (61) in the null industry is in the same range as LGO (77). This means that CMRZF’s stock grew similarly to LGO’s over the last 12 months.

CMRZF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as LGO (100). This means that CMRZF’s stock grew similarly to LGO’s over the last 12 months.

CMRZF's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as LGO (97). This means that CMRZF’s stock grew similarly to LGO’s over the last 12 months.

CMRZF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as LGO (64). This means that CMRZF’s stock grew similarly to LGO’s over the last 12 months.

LGO's P/E Growth Rating (99) in the null industry is in the same range as CMRZF (100). This means that LGO’s stock grew similarly to CMRZF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMRZFLGO
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CMRZF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
LGO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MAXXF0.420.02
+3.83%
MAX PWR MNG CORP.
LNVGY24.240.23
+0.96%
Lenovo Group Ltd.
SHCAY1.17N/A
N/A
Sharp Corp.
HLFDF1.90N/A
N/A
Halfords Group Plc
CLUS200.00N/A
N/A
Cluster Group Holdings Limited Co.

CMRZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMRZF has been loosely correlated with MP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CMRZF jumps, then MP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMRZF
1D Price
Change %
CMRZF100%
N/A
MP - CMRZF
34%
Loosely correlated
-2.13%
UAMY - CMRZF
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.73%
SHERF - CMRZF
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.53%
ELBM - CMRZF
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.06%
LGO - CMRZF
25%
Poorly correlated
+2.48%
More

LGO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LGO has been loosely correlated with ELBM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LGO jumps, then ELBM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LGO
1D Price
Change %
LGO100%
+2.48%
ELBM - LGO
48%
Loosely correlated
+1.06%
NMG - LGO
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.38%
UAMY - LGO
38%
Loosely correlated
-1.73%
WWR - LGO
38%
Loosely correlated
-3.12%
CRML - LGO
36%
Loosely correlated
-6.30%
More