CMRB
Price
$5.10
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 12 closing price
Capitalization
104.73M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
EBSH
Price
Loading...
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Loading...
Capitalization
12.69M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CMRB vs EBSH

Header iconCMRB vs EBSH Comparison
Open Charts CMRB vs EBSHBanner chart's image
First Commerce Ban
Price$5.10
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$500
Capitalization104.73M
Empire Bancshares
PriceLoading...
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$113
Capitalization12.69M
CMRB vs EBSH Comparison Chart in %
CMRB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
EBSH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMRB vs. EBSH commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMRB is a Buy and EBSH is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (CMRB: $5.10 vs. EBSH: $19.20)
Brand notoriety: CMRB and EBSH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMRB: 7% vs. EBSH: 79%
Market capitalization -- CMRB: $104.73M vs. EBSH: $12.69M
CMRB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $104.73M. EBSH’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $12.69M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $171.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMRB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileEBSH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CMRB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • EBSH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CMRB and EBSH are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMRB’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EBSH’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMRB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • EBSH’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CMRB is a better buy in the short-term than EBSH.

Price Growth

CMRB (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.99% price change this week, while EBSH (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.21%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.97% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMRB($105M) has a higher market cap than EBSH($12.7M). CMRB has higher P/E ratio than EBSH: CMRB (24.29) vs EBSH (17.45). EBSH YTD gains are higher at: 6.783 vs. CMRB (2.000). CMRB has higher revenues than EBSH: CMRB (47.6M) vs EBSH (5.97M).
CMRBEBSHCMRB / EBSH
Capitalization105M12.7M827%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD2.0006.78329%
P/E Ratio24.2917.45139%
Revenue47.6M5.97M798%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMRB vs EBSH: Fundamental Ratings
CMRB
EBSH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3034
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
79
Overvalued
61
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6466
SMR RATING
1..100
5483
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5153
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
59
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5038

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EBSH's Valuation (61) in the null industry is in the same range as CMRB (79). This means that EBSH’s stock grew similarly to CMRB’s over the last 12 months.

CMRB's Profit vs Risk Rating (64) in the null industry is in the same range as EBSH (66). This means that CMRB’s stock grew similarly to EBSH’s over the last 12 months.

CMRB's SMR Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as EBSH (83). This means that CMRB’s stock grew similarly to EBSH’s over the last 12 months.

CMRB's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as EBSH (53). This means that CMRB’s stock grew similarly to EBSH’s over the last 12 months.

CMRB's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the null industry is in the same range as EBSH (9). This means that CMRB’s stock grew similarly to EBSH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMRBEBSH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
17%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
24%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
21%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
12%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
10%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
39%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
14%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CMRB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
EBSH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CHMG52.320.93
+1.81%
Chemung Financial Corp
NVGS17.630.17
+0.97%
NAVIGATOR HOLDINGS Ltd
COMP9.500.07
+0.74%
Compass
MCO490.84-2.16
-0.44%
Moody's Corp
IINN0.98-0.05
-4.85%
Inspira Technologies Oxy BHN Ltd

CMRB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMRB has been loosely correlated with AFBI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CMRB jumps, then AFBI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMRB
1D Price
Change %
CMRB100%
N/A
AFBI - CMRB
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.16%
EBSH - CMRB
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RVSB - CMRB
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.55%
BKUT - CMRB
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HONT - CMRB
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

EBSH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EBSH has been loosely correlated with AFBI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EBSH jumps, then AFBI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EBSH
1D Price
Change %
EBSH100%
N/A
AFBI - EBSH
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.16%
CMRB - EBSH
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WSSH - EBSH
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SUGBY - EBSH
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BKUT - EBSH
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More