CMPVF
Price
$23.85
Change
+$0.10 (+0.42%)
Updated
Feb 14 closing price
Capitalization
2.66B
SOPA
Price
$1.32
Change
+$0.09 (+7.32%)
Updated
Jul 21, 04:40 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.1M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CMPVF vs SOPA

Header iconCMPVF vs SOPA Comparison
Open Charts CMPVF vs SOPABanner chart's image
CompuGoup Med SE
Price$23.85
Change+$0.10 (+0.42%)
Volume$421
Capitalization2.66B
Society Pass
Price$1.32
Change+$0.09 (+7.32%)
Volume$172
Capitalization5.1M
CMPVF vs SOPA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SOPA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMPVF vs. SOPA commentary
Jul 22, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMPVF is a Hold and SOPA is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 22, 2025
Stock price -- (CMPVF: $23.85 vs. SOPA: $1.23)
Brand notoriety: CMPVF and SOPA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMPVF: 100% vs. SOPA: 72%
Market capitalization -- CMPVF: $2.66B vs. SOPA: $5.1M
CMPVF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $2.66B. SOPA’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $5.1M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.81B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMPVF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSOPA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CMPVF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SOPA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CMPVF is a better buy in the long-term than SOPA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SOPA’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SOPA’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

CMPVF (@Packaged Software) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SOPA (@Packaged Software) price change was -2.38% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +1.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.12%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+1.60% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMPVF($2.66B) has a higher market cap than SOPA($5.1M). SOPA YTD gains are higher at: 36.971 vs. CMPVF (32.229). CMPVF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 225M vs. SOPA (-20.42M). CMPVF has more cash in the bank: 69.1M vs. SOPA (8.22M). SOPA has less debt than CMPVF: SOPA (1.48M) vs CMPVF (707M). CMPVF has higher revenues than SOPA: CMPVF (1.17B) vs SOPA (9.14M).
CMPVFSOPACMPVF / SOPA
Capitalization2.66B5.1M52,168%
EBITDA225M-20.42M-1,102%
Gain YTD32.22936.97187%
P/E Ratio22.83N/A-
Revenue1.17B9.14M12,790%
Total Cash69.1M8.22M841%
Total Debt707M1.48M47,867%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMPVF: Fundamental Ratings
CMPVF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
4
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
84
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
48
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
17
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMPVFSOPA
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
17%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
18%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SOPA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TSLA329.6510.24
+3.21%
Tesla
AAPL211.181.16
+0.55%
Apple
SPY627.58-0.46
-0.07%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
GME23.28-0.12
-0.51%
GameStop Corp
BTC.X117300.790000-639.187500
-0.54%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency

CMPVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMPVF has been loosely correlated with MGPPF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CMPVF jumps, then MGPPF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMPVF
1D Price
Change %
CMPVF100%
N/A
MGPPF - CMPVF
40%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ROIUF - CMPVF
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
THNCF - CMPVF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SOPA - CMPVF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PTC - CMPVF
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.32%
More

SOPA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SOPA has been closely correlated with OLB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SOPA jumps, then OLB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SOPA
1D Price
Change %
SOPA100%
N/A
OLB - SOPA
86%
Closely correlated
-6.51%
SMSI - SOPA
85%
Closely correlated
-3.02%
MYSZ - SOPA
84%
Closely correlated
+1.17%
GRRR - SOPA
78%
Closely correlated
-5.56%
MRINQ - SOPA
78%
Closely correlated
+37.50%
More