CMPVF
Price
$23.85
Change
+$0.10 (+0.42%)
Updated
Feb 14 closing price
Capitalization
1.34B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SOPA
Price
$1.90
Change
-$0.12 (-5.97%)
Updated
Feb 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
15.29M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CMPVF vs SOPA

Header iconCMPVF vs SOPA Comparison
Open Charts CMPVF vs SOPABanner chart's image
CompuGoup Med SE
Price$23.85
Change+$0.10 (+0.42%)
Volume$421
Capitalization1.34B
Society Pass
Price$1.90
Change-$0.12 (-5.97%)
Volume$318
Capitalization15.29M
CMPVF vs SOPA Comparison Chart in %
CMPVF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SOPA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMPVF vs. SOPA commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMPVF is a StrongBuy and SOPA is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (CMPVF: $33.66 vs. SOPA: $2.01)
Brand notoriety: CMPVF and SOPA are both not notable
CMPVF represents the Services to the Health Industry, while SOPA is part of the Advertising/Marketing Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMPVF: 56% vs. SOPA: 4%
Market capitalization -- CMPVF: $1.34B vs. SOPA: $15.29M
CMPVF [@Services to the Health Industry] is valued at $1.34B. SOPA’s [@Advertising/Marketing Services] market capitalization is $15.29M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Services to the Health Industry] industry ranges from $31.36B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Advertising/Marketing Services] industry ranges from $156.06B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Services to the Health Industry] industry is $1.51B. The average market capitalization across the [@Advertising/Marketing Services] industry is $4.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMPVF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSOPA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CMPVF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SOPA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CMPVF is a better buy in the long-term than SOPA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMPVF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SOPA’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMPVF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • SOPA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CMPVF is a better buy in the short-term than SOPA.

Price Growth

CMPVF (@Services to the Health Industry) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SOPA (@Advertising/Marketing Services) price change was -9.46% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Services to the Health Industry industry was -4.74%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.84%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Advertising/Marketing Services industry was -4.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +55.67%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Services to the Health Industry (-4.74% weekly)

This industry comprises companies that provide services, such as equipment sterilization, research, physician management systems and consulting, that support the healthcare/medical industry. Examples of such companies include Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, which operates one of the largest clinical laboratory networks in the world; Quest Diagnostics Inc., which is a clinical laboratory; and Syneos Health, which is a major clinical research organization.

@Advertising/Marketing Services (-4.73% weekly)

Making a brand known to people, garnering more clients/consumers for its product and solidifying the brand’s position in an industry – all of these are essential to a company’s growth, and that’s where marketing/advertising come in as one of the key catalysts. Advertising industry is a global multibillion-dollar business of public relations and marketing companies, media services and advertising agencies – entities that help to connect manufacturers/producers with customers. Digital media has played a big role in the growth of global advertising, and agencies invest substantially to integrate advanced technologies into their business operations. According to some estimates, the U.S. advertising industry is expected to generate revenue of $52.6 billion by 2023, up from almost $40 billion in 2015 . Omnicom Group Inc., Trade Desk, Inc. and Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. are some of the major U.S. companies in the industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMPVF($1.34B) has a higher market cap than SOPA($15.3M). CMPVF has higher P/E ratio than SOPA: CMPVF (41.34) vs SOPA (0.06). CMPVF YTD gains are higher at: 41.108 vs. SOPA (-47.105). CMPVF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 196M vs. SOPA (-9.85M). CMPVF has more cash in the bank: 129M vs. SOPA (6.55M). SOPA has less debt than CMPVF: SOPA (963K) vs CMPVF (827M). CMPVF has higher revenues than SOPA: CMPVF (1.16B) vs SOPA (7.23M).
CMPVFSOPACMPVF / SOPA
Capitalization1.34B15.3M8,745%
EBITDA196M-9.85M-1,990%
Gain YTD41.108-47.105-87%
P/E Ratio41.340.0672,007%
Revenue1.16B7.23M15,996%
Total Cash129M6.55M1,969%
Total Debt827M963K85,877%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMPVF: Fundamental Ratings
CMPVF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
43
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
85
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
38
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
19
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
17

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMPVFSOPA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
22%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
16%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
17%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CMPVF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SOPA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TSLA421.960.15
+0.04%
Tesla
AAPL269.48-0.53
-0.20%
Apple
SPY689.53-5.88
-0.85%
State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
BTC.X75633.550000-3055.218800
-3.88%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME24.52-1.33
-5.15%
GameStop Corp

CMPVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMPVF has been loosely correlated with MGPPF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CMPVF jumps, then MGPPF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMPVF
1D Price
Change %
CMPVF100%
N/A
MGPPF - CMPVF
40%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ROIUF - CMPVF
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
THNCF - CMPVF
33%
Poorly correlated
-1.99%
SOPA - CMPVF
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.47%
EVTC - CMPVF
27%
Poorly correlated
-5.69%
More