Advertisement
CMPVF vs HUBS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMPVF is a StrongBuy and HUBS is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CMPVF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHUBS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CMPVF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- HUBS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HUBS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- HUBS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
CMPVF (@Services to the Health Industry) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while HUBS (@Packaged Software) price change was +2.69% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Services to the Health Industry industry was +1.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.94%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +1.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was +52.13%.
Reported Earning Dates
HUBS is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Services to the Health Industry (+1.70% weekly)This industry comprises companies that provide services, such as equipment sterilization, research, physician management systems and consulting, that support the healthcare/medical industry. Examples of such companies include Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, which operates one of the largest clinical laboratory networks in the world; Quest Diagnostics Inc., which is a clinical laboratory; and Syneos Health, which is a major clinical research organization.
@Packaged Software (+1.50% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| CMPVF | HUBS | CMPVF / HUBS | |
| Capitalization | 1.34B | 20.3B | 7% |
| EBITDA | 196M | 126M | 156% |
| Gain YTD | 32.229 | -44.431 | -73% |
| P/E Ratio | 41.34 | 7023.44 | 1% |
| Revenue | 1.16B | 2.85B | 41% |
| Total Cash | 129M | 1.67B | 8% |
| Total Debt | 827M | 281M | 294% |
CMPVF | HUBS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 45 | 6 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 7 Undervalued | 100 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 93 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 85 | 90 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 65 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 15 | 76 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CMPVF's Valuation (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HUBS (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CMPVF’s stock grew significantly faster than HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
HUBS's Profit vs Risk Rating (93) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as CMPVF (100) in the null industry. This means that HUBS’s stock grew similarly to CMPVF’s over the last 12 months.
CMPVF's SMR Rating (85) in the null industry is in the same range as HUBS (90) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CMPVF’s stock grew similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
CMPVF's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as HUBS (65) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CMPVF’s stock grew similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
CMPVF's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HUBS (76) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CMPVF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
| CMPVF | HUBS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 87% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 15% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 16% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 22 days ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 79% |
Advertisement
CMPVF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMPVF has been loosely correlated with MGPPF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CMPVF jumps, then MGPPF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CMPVF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CMPVF | 100% | N/A | ||
| MGPPF - CMPVF | 40% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| ROIUF - CMPVF | 39% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| THNCF - CMPVF | 33% Poorly correlated | -6.44% | ||
| SOPA - CMPVF | 28% Poorly correlated | -13.16% | ||
| EVTC - CMPVF | 27% Poorly correlated | +3.80% | ||
More | ||||
HUBS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HUBS has been closely correlated with CRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HUBS jumps, then CRM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HUBS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HUBS | 100% | -1.35% | ||
| CRM - HUBS | 73% Closely correlated | -0.70% | ||
| TEAM - HUBS | 70% Closely correlated | +0.95% | ||
| FRSH - HUBS | 66% Loosely correlated | -2.38% | ||
| S - HUBS | 66% Loosely correlated | -1.64% | ||
| DT - HUBS | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.53% | ||
More | ||||