It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CMPS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLFST’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CMPS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LFST’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).
CMPS (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а -7.74% price change this week, while LFST (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was -5.86% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was -4.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1669.22%.
CMPS is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2025.
LFST is expected to report earnings on Mar 06, 2025.
The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
CMPS | LFST | CMPS / LFST | |
Capitalization | 622M | 2.36B | 26% |
EBITDA | -115.24M | -104.93M | 110% |
Gain YTD | -44.114 | -7.663 | 576% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
Revenue | 0 | 1.06B | - |
Total Cash | 220M | 78.8M | 279% |
Total Debt | 33M | 508M | 6% |
CMPS | LFST | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago87% | 2 days ago83% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 2 days ago75% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago75% | 2 days ago79% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago76% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago88% | 2 days ago83% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago87% | 2 days ago80% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago0% | 4 days ago81% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago88% | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago85% | 2 days ago83% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago88% | 2 days ago83% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that CMPS and AVAH have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CMPS and AVAH's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CMPS | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CMPS | 100% | -1.81% | ||
AVAH - CMPS | 28% Poorly correlated | -4.01% | ||
LFST - CMPS | 25% Poorly correlated | +0.14% | ||
ASTH - CMPS | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.02% | ||
BKD - CMPS | 23% Poorly correlated | -2.02% | ||
SGRY - CMPS | 23% Poorly correlated | -2.88% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LFST has been loosely correlated with ASTH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LFST jumps, then ASTH could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LFST | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
LFST | 100% | +0.14% | ||
ASTH - LFST | 35% Loosely correlated | -0.02% | ||
AVAH - LFST | 33% Poorly correlated | -4.01% | ||
CHE - LFST | 32% Poorly correlated | -0.47% | ||
ENSG - LFST | 31% Poorly correlated | -2.09% | ||
SGRY - LFST | 29% Poorly correlated | -2.88% | ||
More |