Advertisement
CMPRF vs CSASF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMPRF is a Buy and CSASF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CMPRF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileCSASF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- CMPRF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- CSASF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CMPRF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- CMPRF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
Price Growth
CMPRF (@Savings Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CSASF (@Savings Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was -2.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +37.63%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Savings Banks (-2.17% weekly)A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.
| CMPRF | CSASF | CMPRF / CSASF | |
| Capitalization | 4.04B | 3.89B | 104% |
| EBITDA | N/A | 145B | - |
| Gain YTD | 96.324 | 0.000 | - |
| P/E Ratio | 9.66 | 6.55 | 147% |
| Revenue | 44.1B | 438B | 10% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 99.4B | - |
| Total Debt | 30.7B | 3.25T | 1% |
CMPRF | CSASF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 45 | 40 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 66 Overvalued | 16 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 4 | 1 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 2 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 37 | 72 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 14 | 39 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 30 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CSASF's Valuation (16) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMPRF (66). This means that CSASF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMPRF’s over the last 12 months.
CSASF's Profit vs Risk Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as CMPRF (4). This means that CSASF’s stock grew similarly to CMPRF’s over the last 12 months.
CMPRF's SMR Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CSASF (100). This means that CMPRF’s stock grew significantly faster than CSASF’s over the last 12 months.
CMPRF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CSASF (72). This means that CMPRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CSASF’s over the last 12 months.
CMPRF's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the null industry is in the same range as CSASF (39). This means that CMPRF’s stock grew similarly to CSASF’s over the last 12 months.
| CMPRF | CSASF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 25% | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 30% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 37% | 2 days ago 9% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 36% | 2 days ago 9% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FXN | 16.79 | 0.16 | +0.96% |
| First Trust Energy AlphaDEX® ETF | |||
| HYXU | 55.41 | 0.20 | +0.37% |
| iShares International High Yield Bd ETF | |||
| DBC | 22.81 | 0.01 | +0.04% |
| Invesco DB Commodity Tracking | |||
| CRED | 21.20 | N/A | N/A |
| Columbia Research Enhanced Rl Estt ETF | |||
| FEMR | 30.57 | -0.14 | -0.46% |
| Fidelity Enhanced Emerging Markets ETF | |||
CMPRF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CMPRF and ASHTF have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CMPRF and ASHTF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CMPRF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CMPRF | 100% | N/A | ||
| ASHTF - CMPRF | 14% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ASHTY - CMPRF | 13% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| BDIMF - CMPRF | 8% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| AIFLY - CMPRF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CSASF - CMPRF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
CSASF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CSASF and ELEEF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CSASF and ELEEF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CSASF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CSASF | 100% | N/A | ||
| ELEEF - CSASF | 25% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| EDNMY - CSASF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| EDNMF - CSASF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CMPRF - CSASF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| BRRAY - CSASF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||