CMPGY
Price
$34.61
Change
+$0.49 (+1.44%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
57B
23 days until earnings call
NATH
Price
$110.47
Change
+$4.08 (+3.83%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
451.77M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CMPGY vs NATH

Header iconCMPGY vs NATH Comparison
Open Charts CMPGY vs NATHBanner chart's image
Compass Group
Price$34.61
Change+$0.49 (+1.44%)
Volume$290.81K
Capitalization57B
Nathan's Famous
Price$110.47
Change+$4.08 (+3.83%)
Volume$100.27K
Capitalization451.77M
CMPGY vs NATH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CMPGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NATH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMPGY vs. NATH commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMPGY is a StrongBuy and NATH is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (CMPGY: $34.61 vs. NATH: $110.47)
Brand notoriety: CMPGY and NATH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMPGY: 252% vs. NATH: 232%
Market capitalization -- CMPGY: $57B vs. NATH: $451.77M
CMPGY [@Restaurants] is valued at $57B. NATH’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $451.77M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $208.47B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.13B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMPGY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNATH’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CMPGY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NATH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, NATH is a better buy in the long-term than CMPGY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMPGY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NATH’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMPGY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • NATH’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CMPGY is a better buy in the short-term than NATH.

Price Growth

CMPGY (@Restaurants) experienced а +2.99% price change this week, while NATH (@Restaurants) price change was +1.26% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -0.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.08%.

Reported Earning Dates

CMPGY is expected to report earnings on Jul 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-0.36% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMPGY($57B) has a higher market cap than NATH($452M). CMPGY has higher P/E ratio than NATH: CMPGY (40.29) vs NATH (18.82). NATH YTD gains are higher at: 41.892 vs. CMPGY (4.966). CMPGY has more cash in the bank: 437M vs. NATH (7.71M). NATH has less debt than CMPGY: NATH (56.8M) vs CMPGY (7.12B).
CMPGYNATHCMPGY / NATH
Capitalization57B452M12,611%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD4.96641.89212%
P/E Ratio40.2918.82214%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total Cash437M7.71M5,667%
Total Debt7.12B56.8M12,528%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMPGY vs NATH: Fundamental Ratings
CMPGY
NATH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5087
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
55
Fair valued
52
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
69
SMR RATING
1..100
9741
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5340
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1723
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NATH's Valuation (52) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as CMPGY (55) in the null industry. This means that NATH’s stock grew similarly to CMPGY’s over the last 12 months.

CMPGY's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the null industry is in the same range as NATH (9) in the Restaurants industry. This means that CMPGY’s stock grew similarly to NATH’s over the last 12 months.

NATH's SMR Rating (41) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMPGY (97) in the null industry. This means that NATH’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMPGY’s over the last 12 months.

NATH's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as CMPGY (53) in the null industry. This means that NATH’s stock grew similarly to CMPGY’s over the last 12 months.

CMPGY's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the null industry is in the same range as NATH (23) in the Restaurants industry. This means that CMPGY’s stock grew similarly to NATH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMPGYNATH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CMPGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NATH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CLAR3.580.04
+1.27%
Clarus Corp
SAFT78.840.40
+0.51%
Safety Insurance Group
SE159.310.80
+0.50%
Sea Limited
VAL41.86-0.29
-0.69%
Valaris Limited
RVP0.62-0.04
-6.27%
Retractable Technologies

CMPGY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CMPGY and CMPGF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CMPGY and CMPGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMPGY
1D Price
Change %
CMPGY100%
+1.44%
CMPGF - CMPGY
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NATH - CMPGY
22%
Poorly correlated
+3.84%
CNNE - CMPGY
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.05%
BPZZF - CMPGY
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KRUS - CMPGY
13%
Poorly correlated
-0.29%
More

NATH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NATH has been loosely correlated with LOCO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NATH jumps, then LOCO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NATH
1D Price
Change %
NATH100%
+3.84%
LOCO - NATH
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.91%
PZZA - NATH
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.33%
PBPB - NATH
33%
Loosely correlated
+3.79%
RICK - NATH
33%
Loosely correlated
+0.75%
CNNE - NATH
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.05%
More