CMPGY
Price
$33.35
Change
+$0.18 (+0.54%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
56.17B
61 days until earnings call
NATH
Price
$106.56
Change
+$0.15 (+0.14%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
435.78M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CMPGY vs NATH

Header iconCMPGY vs NATH Comparison
Open Charts CMPGY vs NATHBanner chart's image
Compass Group
Price$33.35
Change+$0.18 (+0.54%)
Volume$214.99K
Capitalization56.17B
Nathan's Famous
Price$106.56
Change+$0.15 (+0.14%)
Volume$15.7K
Capitalization435.78M
CMPGY vs NATH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CMPGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NATH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMPGY vs. NATH commentary
Sep 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMPGY is a StrongBuy and NATH is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 25, 2025
Stock price -- (CMPGY: $33.35 vs. NATH: $106.56)
Brand notoriety: CMPGY and NATH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMPGY: 87% vs. NATH: 50%
Market capitalization -- CMPGY: $56.17B vs. NATH: $435.78M
CMPGY [@Restaurants] is valued at $56.17B. NATH’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $435.78M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $217.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $7.71B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMPGY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNATH’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CMPGY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NATH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, NATH is a better buy in the long-term than CMPGY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMPGY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NATH’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMPGY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • NATH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CMPGY is a better buy in the short-term than NATH.

Price Growth

CMPGY (@Restaurants) experienced а -3.70% price change this week, while NATH (@Restaurants) price change was -0.62% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -0.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.98%.

Reported Earning Dates

CMPGY is expected to report earnings on Nov 25, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-0.11% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMPGY($56.2B) has a higher market cap than NATH($436M). CMPGY has higher P/E ratio than NATH: CMPGY (38.82) vs NATH (18.50). NATH YTD gains are higher at: 37.501 vs. CMPGY (1.144). CMPGY has more cash in the bank: 437M vs. NATH (26.9M). NATH has less debt than CMPGY: NATH (54.9M) vs CMPGY (7.12B).
CMPGYNATHCMPGY / NATH
Capitalization56.2B436M12,890%
EBITDAN/A37M-
Gain YTD1.14437.5013%
P/E Ratio38.8218.50210%
RevenueN/A150M-
Total Cash437M26.9M1,625%
Total Debt7.12B54.9M12,962%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMPGY vs NATH: Fundamental Ratings
CMPGY
NATH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5910
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
48
Fair valued
59
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
914
SMR RATING
1..100
9540
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6152
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2924
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CMPGY's Valuation (48) in the null industry is in the same range as NATH (59) in the Restaurants industry. This means that CMPGY’s stock grew similarly to NATH’s over the last 12 months.

CMPGY's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the null industry is in the same range as NATH (14) in the Restaurants industry. This means that CMPGY’s stock grew similarly to NATH’s over the last 12 months.

NATH's SMR Rating (40) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMPGY (95) in the null industry. This means that NATH’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMPGY’s over the last 12 months.

NATH's Price Growth Rating (52) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as CMPGY (61) in the null industry. This means that NATH’s stock grew similarly to CMPGY’s over the last 12 months.

NATH's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as CMPGY (29) in the null industry. This means that NATH’s stock grew similarly to CMPGY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMPGYNATH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
34%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
52%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CMPGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NATH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ICU1.240.08
+6.90%
SeaStar Medical Holding Corp
JBIO8.120.51
+6.70%
Jade Biosciences Inc
IRTC173.93-1.53
-0.87%
iRhythm Technologies
MSTR323.31-4.47
-1.36%
Strategy Inc
PRLB49.34-1.50
-2.95%
Proto Labs

CMPGY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CMPGY and CMPGF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CMPGY and CMPGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMPGY
1D Price
Change %
CMPGY100%
+0.54%
CMPGF - CMPGY
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.86%
NATH - CMPGY
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.14%
CNNE - CMPGY
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.45%
BPZZF - CMPGY
15%
Poorly correlated
-5.06%
KRUS - CMPGY
13%
Poorly correlated
-2.42%
More

NATH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NATH has been loosely correlated with LOCO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NATH jumps, then LOCO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NATH
1D Price
Change %
NATH100%
+0.14%
LOCO - NATH
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.80%
BROS - NATH
35%
Loosely correlated
-2.28%
RICK - NATH
30%
Poorly correlated
+9.18%
FWRG - NATH
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.38%
PZZA - NATH
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.96%
More