CMPGY
Price
$30.86
Change
-$0.30 (-0.96%)
Updated
Jan 15 closing price
Capitalization
53.04B
20 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FWRG
Price
$16.60
Change
-$0.12 (-0.72%)
Updated
Jan 16, 11:27 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.02B
53 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CMPGY vs FWRG

Header iconCMPGY vs FWRG Comparison
Open Charts CMPGY vs FWRGBanner chart's image
Compass Group
Price$30.86
Change-$0.30 (-0.96%)
Volume$274.1K
Capitalization53.04B
First Watch Restaurant Group
Price$16.60
Change-$0.12 (-0.72%)
Volume$200
Capitalization1.02B
CMPGY vs FWRG Comparison Chart in %
CMPGY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FWRG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMPGY vs. FWRG commentary
Jan 16, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMPGY is a Hold and FWRG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 16, 2026
Stock price -- (CMPGY: $30.86 vs. FWRG: $16.72)
Brand notoriety: CMPGY and FWRG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMPGY: 30% vs. FWRG: 88%
Market capitalization -- CMPGY: $53.04B vs. FWRG: $1.02B
CMPGY [@Restaurants] is valued at $53.04B. FWRG’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $1.02B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $219.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.13B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMPGY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFWRG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CMPGY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FWRG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CMPGY and FWRG are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMPGY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FWRG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMPGY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FWRG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CMPGY is a better buy in the short-term than FWRG.

Price Growth

CMPGY (@Restaurants) experienced а -2.56% price change this week, while FWRG (@Restaurants) price change was +8.36% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +1.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.32%.

Reported Earning Dates

CMPGY is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2026.

FWRG is expected to report earnings on Mar 10, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+1.36% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMPGY($53B) has a higher market cap than FWRG($1.02B). FWRG has higher P/E ratio than CMPGY: FWRG (209.00) vs CMPGY (28.08). FWRG YTD gains are higher at: 10.875 vs. CMPGY (-3.532). CMPGY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.6B vs. FWRG (93.7M). CMPGY has more cash in the bank: 437M vs. FWRG (20.7M). FWRG has less debt than CMPGY: FWRG (982M) vs CMPGY (7.12B). CMPGY has higher revenues than FWRG: CMPGY (43.8B) vs FWRG (1.17B).
CMPGYFWRGCMPGY / FWRG
Capitalization53B1.02B5,196%
EBITDA3.6B93.7M3,842%
Gain YTD-3.53210.875-32%
P/E Ratio28.08209.0013%
Revenue43.8B1.17B3,747%
Total Cash437M20.7M2,111%
Total Debt7.12B982M725%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMPGY: Fundamental Ratings
CMPGY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
87
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
55
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
20
SMR RATING
1..100
95
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
74
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
85
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMPGYFWRG
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CMPGY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FWRG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CVLEX16.200.15
+0.93%
Cullen Value Retail
THIGX39.420.32
+0.82%
Thornburg Small/Mid Cap Growth I
OCLVX20.240.10
+0.50%
Optimum Large Cap Value C
MFRKX56.760.28
+0.50%
MFS Research R6
DLHCX22.90-0.34
-1.46%
Nomura Healthcare Fund Class C

CMPGY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CMPGY and FWRG have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CMPGY and FWRG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMPGY
1D Price
Change %
CMPGY100%
-0.96%
FWRG - CMPGY
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.91%
ARCO - CMPGY
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.65%
DIN - CMPGY
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.62%
CMPGF - CMPGY
23%
Poorly correlated
+4.11%
NATH - CMPGY
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.82%
More

FWRG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FWRG has been loosely correlated with CAKE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FWRG jumps, then CAKE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FWRG
1D Price
Change %
FWRG100%
+0.91%
CAKE - FWRG
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.98%
KRUS - FWRG
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.18%
DIN - FWRG
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.62%
BJRI - FWRG
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.62%
DRI - FWRG
51%
Loosely correlated
+3.11%
More