CMPGY
Price
$34.79
Change
+$0.14 (+0.40%)
Updated
Oct 14 closing price
Capitalization
57.87B
40 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
FWRG
Price
$18.13
Change
+$0.60 (+3.42%)
Updated
Oct 15, 11:15 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.07B
25 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CMPGY vs FWRG

Header iconCMPGY vs FWRG Comparison
Open Charts CMPGY vs FWRGBanner chart's image
Compass Group
Price$34.79
Change+$0.14 (+0.40%)
Volume$197.53K
Capitalization57.87B
First Watch Restaurant Group
Price$18.13
Change+$0.60 (+3.42%)
Volume$400
Capitalization1.07B
CMPGY vs FWRG Comparison Chart in %
CMPGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FWRG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMPGY vs. FWRG commentary
Oct 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMPGY is a Hold and FWRG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 16, 2025
Stock price -- (CMPGY: $34.79 vs. FWRG: $17.53)
Brand notoriety: CMPGY and FWRG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMPGY: 62% vs. FWRG: 114%
Market capitalization -- CMPGY: $57.87B vs. FWRG: $1.07B
CMPGY [@Restaurants] is valued at $57.87B. FWRG’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $1.07B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $217.34B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $7.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMPGY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFWRG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CMPGY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FWRG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CMPGY is a better buy in the long-term than FWRG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMPGY’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FWRG’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMPGY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • FWRG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CMPGY is a better buy in the short-term than FWRG.

Price Growth

CMPGY (@Restaurants) experienced а +2.08% price change this week, while FWRG (@Restaurants) price change was +10.11% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +0.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.69%.

Reported Earning Dates

CMPGY is expected to report earnings on Nov 25, 2025.

FWRG is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+0.62% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMPGY($57.9B) has a higher market cap than FWRG($1.07B). FWRG has higher P/E ratio than CMPGY: FWRG (292.17) vs CMPGY (40.50). CMPGY YTD gains are higher at: 5.512 vs. FWRG (-5.803). CMPGY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.6B vs. FWRG (93.7M). CMPGY has more cash in the bank: 437M vs. FWRG (19.2M). FWRG has less debt than CMPGY: FWRG (959M) vs CMPGY (7.12B). CMPGY has higher revenues than FWRG: CMPGY (43.8B) vs FWRG (773M).
CMPGYFWRGCMPGY / FWRG
Capitalization57.9B1.07B5,411%
EBITDA3.6B93.7M3,842%
Gain YTD5.512-5.803-95%
P/E Ratio40.50292.1714%
Revenue43.8B773M5,666%
Total Cash437M19.2M2,276%
Total Debt7.12B959M742%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMPGY: Fundamental Ratings
CMPGY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
14
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
38
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9
SMR RATING
1..100
95
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
55
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
27
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMPGYFWRG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CMPGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FWRG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IMMP2.090.10
+5.03%
Immutep Limited
AUID2.690.04
+1.51%
authID
MTN154.281.88
+1.23%
Vail Resorts
TRML47.89-0.02
-0.04%
Tourmaline Bio
MRVL86.22-3.17
-3.55%
Marvell Technology

CMPGY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CMPGY and FWRG have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CMPGY and FWRG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMPGY
1D Price
Change %
CMPGY100%
+0.40%
FWRG - CMPGY
25%
Poorly correlated
+7.88%
ARCO - CMPGY
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.43%
DIN - CMPGY
23%
Poorly correlated
+6.24%
CMPGF - CMPGY
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.38%
NATH - CMPGY
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.06%
More

FWRG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FWRG has been loosely correlated with CAKE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FWRG jumps, then CAKE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FWRG
1D Price
Change %
FWRG100%
+7.88%
CAKE - FWRG
50%
Loosely correlated
+1.36%
BJRI - FWRG
50%
Loosely correlated
+2.53%
FRSH - FWRG
49%
Loosely correlated
-1.24%
DIN - FWRG
48%
Loosely correlated
+6.24%
KRUS - FWRG
46%
Loosely correlated
+9.81%
More