CMPGY
Price
$34.61
Change
+$0.49 (+1.44%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
57B
23 days until earnings call
DMZPY
Price
$6.25
Change
-$0.54 (-7.96%)
Updated
Jun 23 closing price
Capitalization
1.18B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CMPGY vs DMZPY

Header iconCMPGY vs DMZPY Comparison
Open Charts CMPGY vs DMZPYBanner chart's image
Compass Group
Price$34.61
Change+$0.49 (+1.44%)
Volume$290.81K
Capitalization57B
Domino's Pizza Australia New Zealand
Price$6.25
Change-$0.54 (-7.96%)
Volume$581
Capitalization1.18B
CMPGY vs DMZPY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CMPGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DMZPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMPGY vs. DMZPY commentary
Jun 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMPGY is a StrongBuy and DMZPY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (CMPGY: $34.61 vs. DMZPY: $6.24)
Brand notoriety: CMPGY and DMZPY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMPGY: 252% vs. DMZPY: 77%
Market capitalization -- CMPGY: $57B vs. DMZPY: $1.18B
CMPGY [@Restaurants] is valued at $57B. DMZPY’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $1.18B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $208.47B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.13B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMPGY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileDMZPY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CMPGY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • DMZPY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CMPGY is a better buy in the long-term than DMZPY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMPGY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DMZPY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMPGY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • DMZPY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CMPGY is a better buy in the short-term than DMZPY.

Price Growth

CMPGY (@Restaurants) experienced а +2.99% price change this week, while DMZPY (@Restaurants) price change was -7.86% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -0.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.08%.

Reported Earning Dates

CMPGY is expected to report earnings on Jul 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-0.36% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMPGY($57B) has a higher market cap than DMZPY($1.18B). DMZPY has higher P/E ratio than CMPGY: DMZPY (138.09) vs CMPGY (40.29). CMPGY YTD gains are higher at: 4.966 vs. DMZPY (-31.592).
CMPGYDMZPYCMPGY / DMZPY
Capitalization57B1.18B4,831%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD4.966-31.592-16%
P/E Ratio40.29138.0929%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total Cash437MN/A-
Total Debt7.12BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMPGY vs DMZPY: Fundamental Ratings
CMPGY
DMZPY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
55
Fair valued
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6100
SMR RATING
1..100
9791
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5391
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
175
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DMZPY's Valuation (19) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMPGY (55). This means that DMZPY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMPGY’s over the last 12 months.

CMPGY's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for DMZPY (100). This means that CMPGY’s stock grew significantly faster than DMZPY’s over the last 12 months.

DMZPY's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as CMPGY (97). This means that DMZPY’s stock grew similarly to CMPGY’s over the last 12 months.

CMPGY's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DMZPY (91). This means that CMPGY’s stock grew somewhat faster than DMZPY’s over the last 12 months.

DMZPY's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the null industry is in the same range as CMPGY (17). This means that DMZPY’s stock grew similarly to CMPGY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMPGYDMZPY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
45%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
36%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CMPGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DMZPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CLAR3.580.04
+1.27%
Clarus Corp
SAFT78.840.40
+0.51%
Safety Insurance Group
SE159.310.80
+0.50%
Sea Limited
VAL41.86-0.29
-0.69%
Valaris Limited
RVP0.62-0.04
-6.27%
Retractable Technologies

CMPGY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CMPGY and CMPGF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CMPGY and CMPGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMPGY
1D Price
Change %
CMPGY100%
+1.44%
CMPGF - CMPGY
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NATH - CMPGY
22%
Poorly correlated
+3.84%
CNNE - CMPGY
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.05%
BPZZF - CMPGY
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KRUS - CMPGY
13%
Poorly correlated
-0.29%
More

DMZPY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DMZPY and DPUKY have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DMZPY and DPUKY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DMZPY
1D Price
Change %
DMZPY100%
N/A
DPUKY - DMZPY
5%
Poorly correlated
+3.80%
KRUS - DMZPY
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.29%
BPZZF - DMZPY
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CMPGF - DMZPY
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CMPGY - DMZPY
0%
Poorly correlated
+1.44%
More