CMPGY
Price
$33.83
Change
-$0.15 (-0.44%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
58.21B
82 days until earnings call
DMPZF
Price
$2.80
Change
+$0.05 (+1.82%)
Updated
Sep 2 closing price
Capitalization
1.08B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CMPGY vs DMPZF

Header iconCMPGY vs DMPZF Comparison
Open Charts CMPGY vs DMPZFBanner chart's image
Compass Group
Price$33.83
Change-$0.15 (-0.44%)
Volume$1.17M
Capitalization58.21B
Domino's Pizza Australia New Zealand
Price$2.80
Change+$0.05 (+1.82%)
Volume$4K
Capitalization1.08B
CMPGY vs DMPZF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CMPGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DMPZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMPGY vs. DMPZF commentary
Sep 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMPGY is a Hold and DMPZF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 04, 2025
Stock price -- (CMPGY: $33.83 vs. DMPZF: $2.80)
Brand notoriety: CMPGY and DMPZF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMPGY: 406% vs. DMPZF: 322%
Market capitalization -- CMPGY: $58.21B vs. DMPZF: $1.08B
CMPGY [@Restaurants] is valued at $58.21B. DMPZF’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $1.08B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $225.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMPGY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileDMPZF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CMPGY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • DMPZF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CMPGY is a better buy in the long-term than DMPZF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMPGY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DMPZF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMPGY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • DMPZF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DMPZF is a better buy in the short-term than CMPGY.

Price Growth

CMPGY (@Restaurants) experienced а -1.57% price change this week, while DMPZF (@Restaurants) price change was +1.82% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +0.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.53%.

Reported Earning Dates

CMPGY is expected to report earnings on Nov 25, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+0.54% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMPGY($58.2B) has a higher market cap than DMPZF($1.09B). CMPGY has higher P/E ratio than DMPZF: CMPGY (39.38) vs DMPZF (10.44). CMPGY YTD gains are higher at: 2.600 vs. DMPZF (-27.083). CMPGY has more cash in the bank: 437M vs. DMPZF (14.4M). DMPZF has less debt than CMPGY: DMPZF (230M) vs CMPGY (7.12B).
CMPGYDMPZFCMPGY / DMPZF
Capitalization58.2B1.09B5,364%
EBITDAN/A163M-
Gain YTD2.600-27.083-10%
P/E Ratio39.3810.44377%
RevenueN/A669M-
Total Cash437M14.4M3,035%
Total Debt7.12B230M3,094%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMPGY vs DMPZF: Fundamental Ratings
CMPGY
DMPZF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5495
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
55
Fair valued
5
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8100
SMR RATING
1..100
9511
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5987
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2888
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DMPZF's Valuation (5) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMPGY (55). This means that DMPZF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMPGY’s over the last 12 months.

CMPGY's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for DMPZF (100). This means that CMPGY’s stock grew significantly faster than DMPZF’s over the last 12 months.

DMPZF's SMR Rating (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CMPGY (95). This means that DMPZF’s stock grew significantly faster than CMPGY’s over the last 12 months.

CMPGY's Price Growth Rating (59) in the null industry is in the same range as DMPZF (87). This means that CMPGY’s stock grew similarly to DMPZF’s over the last 12 months.

CMPGY's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DMPZF (88). This means that CMPGY’s stock grew somewhat faster than DMPZF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMPGYDMPZF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
40%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
42%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
46%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
23%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
22%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
64%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
22%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CMPGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DMPZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MMBLX12.860.04
+0.30%
MassMutual Balanced Adm
SEEKX37.79N/A
N/A
Steward Values Enhanced Lg Cap A
FIQRX20.76N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stk Z
MMUFX24.18-0.04
-0.17%
MFS Utilities A
RRFDX37.15-0.07
-0.19%
T. Rowe Price Equity Income R

CMPGY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CMPGY and CMPGF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CMPGY and CMPGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMPGY
1D Price
Change %
CMPGY100%
-0.44%
CMPGF - CMPGY
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.13%
NATH - CMPGY
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.34%
CNNE - CMPGY
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.02%
BPZZF - CMPGY
15%
Poorly correlated
+0.03%
KRUS - CMPGY
13%
Poorly correlated
-0.51%
More

DMPZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DMPZF and BDVB have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DMPZF and BDVB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DMPZF
1D Price
Change %
DMPZF100%
N/A
BDVB - DMPZF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CMPGF - DMPZF
8%
Poorly correlated
+1.13%
CMPGY - DMPZF
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.44%
KRUS - DMPZF
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.51%
DPUKY - DMPZF
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.53%
More