CMPGY
Price
$31.12
Change
+$0.16 (+0.52%)
Updated
Dec 3 closing price
Capitalization
52.4B
63 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
DIN
Price
$31.65
Change
+$0.52 (+1.67%)
Updated
Dec 3 closing price
Capitalization
456.51M
90 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CMPGY vs DIN

Header iconCMPGY vs DIN Comparison
Open Charts CMPGY vs DINBanner chart's image
Compass Group
Price$31.12
Change+$0.16 (+0.52%)
Volume$747.44K
Capitalization52.4B
Dine Brands Global
Price$31.65
Change+$0.52 (+1.67%)
Volume$435.06K
Capitalization456.51M
CMPGY vs DIN Comparison Chart in %
CMPGY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
DIN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMPGY vs. DIN commentary
Dec 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMPGY is a Hold and DIN is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 04, 2025
Stock price -- (CMPGY: $31.08 vs. DIN: $31.15)
Brand notoriety: CMPGY and DIN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMPGY: 329% vs. DIN: 20%
Market capitalization -- CMPGY: $53.29B vs. DIN: $434.87M
CMPGY [@Restaurants] is valued at $53.29B. DIN’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $434.87M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $216.19B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $7.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMPGY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileDIN’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CMPGY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • DIN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, DIN is a better buy in the long-term than CMPGY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMPGY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DIN’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMPGY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • DIN’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DIN is a better buy in the short-term than CMPGY.

Price Growth

CMPGY (@Restaurants) experienced а -1.89% price change this week, while DIN (@Restaurants) price change was +3.04% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +1.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was -12.48%.

Reported Earning Dates

CMPGY is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2026.

DIN is expected to report earnings on Mar 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+1.04% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMPGY($52.4B) has a higher market cap than DIN($457M). CMPGY has higher P/E ratio than DIN: CMPGY (28.32) vs DIN (14.13). DIN YTD gains are higher at: 10.005 vs. CMPGY (-5.740). CMPGY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.6B vs. DIN (178M). DIN has less debt than CMPGY: DIN (1.64B) vs CMPGY (7.12B). CMPGY has higher revenues than DIN: CMPGY (43.8B) vs DIN (845M).
CMPGYDINCMPGY / DIN
Capitalization52.4B457M11,466%
EBITDA3.6B178M2,022%
Gain YTD-5.74010.005-57%
P/E Ratio28.3214.13200%
Revenue43.8B845M5,183%
Total Cash437MN/A-
Total Debt7.12B1.64B434%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMPGY vs DIN: Fundamental Ratings
CMPGY
DIN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
32
Undervalued
7
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10100
SMR RATING
1..100
93100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7540
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
827
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DIN's Valuation (7) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as CMPGY (32) in the null industry. This means that DIN’s stock grew similarly to CMPGY’s over the last 12 months.

CMPGY's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for DIN (100) in the Restaurants industry. This means that CMPGY’s stock grew significantly faster than DIN’s over the last 12 months.

CMPGY's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as DIN (100) in the Restaurants industry. This means that CMPGY’s stock grew similarly to DIN’s over the last 12 months.

DIN's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMPGY (75) in the null industry. This means that DIN’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMPGY’s over the last 12 months.

DIN's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for CMPGY (82) in the null industry. This means that DIN’s stock grew significantly faster than CMPGY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMPGYDIN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
87%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CMPGY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
DIN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JHDAX19.74N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Hedged Equity 2 A
TGVCX58.19N/A
N/A
Touchstone Dynamic Large Cap Growth C
ATEYX166.58N/A
N/A
AB Sustainable Global Thematic Advisor
SUSYX15.09N/A
N/A
SEI US Managed Volatility Y (SIMT)
FLIAX10.91N/A
N/A
First Sentier American Listed Infras I

CMPGY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CMPGY and FWRG have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CMPGY and FWRG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMPGY
1D Price
Change %
CMPGY100%
N/A
FWRG - CMPGY
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.11%
ARCO - CMPGY
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.93%
DIN - CMPGY
23%
Poorly correlated
+3.32%
CMPGF - CMPGY
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NATH - CMPGY
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.89%
More

DIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DIN has been closely correlated with CBRL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DIN jumps, then CBRL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DIN
1D Price
Change %
DIN100%
+3.32%
CBRL - DIN
70%
Closely correlated
N/A
BLMN - DIN
65%
Loosely correlated
-2.18%
BJRI - DIN
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.30%
CAKE - DIN
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.97%
FWRG - DIN
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.11%
More