CMPGF
Price
$33.61
Change
+$0.61 (+1.85%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
56.17B
KRUS
Price
$63.54
Change
-$1.57 (-2.41%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
768.45M
41 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CMPGF vs KRUS

Header iconCMPGF vs KRUS Comparison
Open Charts CMPGF vs KRUSBanner chart's image
Compass Group
Price$33.61
Change+$0.61 (+1.85%)
Volume$608
Capitalization56.17B
Kura Sushi USA
Price$63.54
Change-$1.57 (-2.41%)
Volume$452.95K
Capitalization768.45M
CMPGF vs KRUS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CMPGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KRUS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMPGF vs. KRUS commentary
Sep 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMPGF is a StrongBuy and KRUS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 25, 2025
Stock price -- (CMPGF: $33.61 vs. KRUS: $63.54)
Brand notoriety: CMPGF and KRUS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMPGF: 13% vs. KRUS: 181%
Market capitalization -- CMPGF: $56.17B vs. KRUS: $768.45M
CMPGF [@Restaurants] is valued at $56.17B. KRUS’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $768.45M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $217.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $7.71B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMPGF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileKRUS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CMPGF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • KRUS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CMPGF is a better buy in the long-term than KRUS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMPGF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KRUS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMPGF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • KRUS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CMPGF is a better buy in the short-term than KRUS.

Price Growth

CMPGF (@Restaurants) experienced а -5.00% price change this week, while KRUS (@Restaurants) price change was -16.59% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -1.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.04%.

Reported Earning Dates

KRUS is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-1.49% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMPGF($56.2B) has a higher market cap than KRUS($768M). KRUS has higher P/E ratio than CMPGF: KRUS (292.35) vs CMPGF (39.13). CMPGF YTD gains are higher at: 3.810 vs. KRUS (-29.852). CMPGF has more cash in the bank: 437M vs. KRUS (60M). KRUS has less debt than CMPGF: KRUS (166M) vs CMPGF (7.12B).
CMPGFKRUSCMPGF / KRUS
Capitalization56.2B768M7,318%
EBITDAN/A4.17M-
Gain YTD3.810-29.852-13%
P/E Ratio39.13292.3513%
RevenueN/A269M-
Total Cash437M60M728%
Total Debt7.12B166M4,287%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMPGF vs KRUS: Fundamental Ratings
CMPGF
KRUS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9654
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
100
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1159
SMR RATING
1..100
9593
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6164
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
26100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
65n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CMPGF's Valuation (50) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KRUS (100). This means that CMPGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than KRUS’s over the last 12 months.

CMPGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KRUS (59). This means that CMPGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than KRUS’s over the last 12 months.

KRUS's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as CMPGF (95). This means that KRUS’s stock grew similarly to CMPGF’s over the last 12 months.

CMPGF's Price Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as KRUS (64). This means that CMPGF’s stock grew similarly to KRUS’s over the last 12 months.

CMPGF's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for KRUS (100). This means that CMPGF’s stock grew significantly faster than KRUS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMPGFKRUS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
34%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
86%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
26%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CMPGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KRUS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FKUTX25.450.16
+0.63%
Franklin Utilities A1
CBBIX6.85N/A
N/A
AB Relative Value I
ESERX34.74-0.18
-0.52%
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital Sel Eq R6
FTMSX28.04-0.16
-0.57%
FullerThaler Behvrl Mcr-Cp Eq Instl
IVCSX14.49-0.12
-0.82%
Voya Small Company Port I

CMPGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CMPGF and CMPGY have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CMPGF and CMPGY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMPGF
1D Price
Change %
CMPGF100%
+1.86%
CMPGY - CMPGF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.54%
KRUS - CMPGF
11%
Poorly correlated
-2.42%
DMPZF - CMPGF
8%
Poorly correlated
-1.96%
BPZZF - CMPGF
4%
Poorly correlated
-5.06%
JDWPY - CMPGF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

KRUS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KRUS has been loosely correlated with CAKE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KRUS jumps, then CAKE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KRUS
1D Price
Change %
KRUS100%
-2.42%
CAKE - KRUS
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.90%
TXRH - KRUS
52%
Loosely correlated
+1.32%
SHAK - KRUS
52%
Loosely correlated
-2.79%
BJRI - KRUS
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.07%
FWRG - KRUS
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.38%
More