It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CMPD’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileOCLCF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CMPD’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OCLCF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
CMPD (@Services to the Health Industry) experienced а +7.77% price change this week, while OCLCF (@Computer Communications) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Services to the Health Industry industry was +1.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.83%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +0.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +21.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was +56.00%.
This industry comprises companies that provide services, such as equipment sterilization, research, physician management systems and consulting, that support the healthcare/medical industry. Examples of such companies include Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, which operates one of the largest clinical laboratory networks in the world; Quest Diagnostics Inc., which is a clinical laboratory; and Syneos Health, which is a major clinical research organization.
@Computer Communications (+0.40% weekly)Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
CMPD | OCLCF | CMPD / OCLCF | |
Capitalization | 5.68M | 14.4B | 0% |
EBITDA | N/A | 84.7B | - |
Gain YTD | 12.861 | 19.356 | 66% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | 33.83 | - |
Revenue | N/A | 252B | - |
Total Cash | N/A | 33B | - |
Total Debt | 190K | N/A | - |
CMPD | OCLCF | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 84 Overvalued | 28 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 99 | 96 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 3 | 14 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 37 | 45 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 16 | 18 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 65 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
OCLCF's Valuation (28) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMPD (84). This means that OCLCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMPD’s over the last 12 months.
OCLCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as CMPD (99). This means that OCLCF’s stock grew similarly to CMPD’s over the last 12 months.
CMPD's SMR Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as OCLCF (14). This means that CMPD’s stock grew similarly to OCLCF’s over the last 12 months.
CMPD's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as OCLCF (45). This means that CMPD’s stock grew similarly to OCLCF’s over the last 12 months.
CMPD's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is in the same range as OCLCF (18). This means that CMPD’s stock grew similarly to OCLCF’s over the last 12 months.
CMPD | OCLCF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago90% | 4 days ago10% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago90% | 4 days ago13% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago70% | 4 days ago37% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago77% | 4 days ago16% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago65% | 4 days ago20% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago64% | 4 days ago32% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago67% | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago86% | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago17% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMPD has been loosely correlated with OCLCF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CMPD jumps, then OCLCF could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CMPD | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CMPD | 100% | N/A | ||
OCLCF - CMPD | 33% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
PMCUF - CMPD | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
IARGF - CMPD | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
COGZF - CMPD | 12% Poorly correlated | +1.85% | ||
CINGF - CMPD | 7% Poorly correlated | -10.00% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OCLCF has been loosely correlated with XPER. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OCLCF jumps, then XPER could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To OCLCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
OCLCF | 100% | N/A | ||
XPER - OCLCF | 34% Loosely correlated | +1.83% | ||
CMPD - OCLCF | 33% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
PMCUF - OCLCF | 31% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
HUBC - OCLCF | 25% Poorly correlated | +11.55% | ||
CLBT - OCLCF | 25% Poorly correlated | -1.81% | ||
More |