CMPD
Price
$3.94
Change
-$0.72 (-15.45%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
5.2M
COGZF
Price
$1.05
Change
-$0.08 (-7.08%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
191.44M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CMPD vs COGZF

Header iconCMPD vs COGZF Comparison
Open Charts CMPD vs COGZFBanner chart's image
CompuMed
Price$3.94
Change-$0.72 (-15.45%)
Volume$152
Capitalization5.2M
Cogstate
Price$1.05
Change-$0.08 (-7.08%)
Volume$4K
Capitalization191.44M
CMPD vs COGZF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CMPD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
COGZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMPD vs. COGZF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMPD is a Hold and COGZF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CMPD: $3.94 vs. COGZF: $1.05)
Brand notoriety: CMPD and COGZF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Services to the Health Industry industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMPD: 13% vs. COGZF: 64%
Market capitalization -- CMPD: $5.2M vs. COGZF: $191.44M
CMPD [@Services to the Health Industry] is valued at $5.2M. COGZF’s [@Services to the Health Industry] market capitalization is $191.44M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Services to the Health Industry] industry ranges from $44.74B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Services to the Health Industry] industry is $2.24B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMPD’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCOGZF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CMPD’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • COGZF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CMPD is a better buy in the long-term than COGZF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMPD’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while COGZF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMPD’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • COGZF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, COGZF is a better buy in the short-term than CMPD.

Price Growth

CMPD (@Services to the Health Industry) experienced а -16.88% price change this week, while COGZF (@Services to the Health Industry) price change was -4.55% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Services to the Health Industry industry was -2.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.21%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Services to the Health Industry (-2.30% weekly)

This industry comprises companies that provide services, such as equipment sterilization, research, physician management systems and consulting, that support the healthcare/medical industry. Examples of such companies include Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, which operates one of the largest clinical laboratory networks in the world; Quest Diagnostics Inc., which is a clinical laboratory; and Syneos Health, which is a major clinical research organization.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
COGZF($191M) has a higher market cap than CMPD($5.2M). COGZF YTD gains are higher at: 68.000 vs. CMPD (3.412).
CMPDCOGZFCMPD / COGZF
Capitalization5.2M191M3%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD3.41268.0005%
P/E RatioN/A18.01-
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt190KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMPD vs COGZF: Fundamental Ratings
CMPD
COGZF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5386
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
85
Overvalued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10068
SMR RATING
1..100
367
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4143
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1654
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3785

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

COGZF's Valuation (16) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CMPD (85). This means that COGZF’s stock grew significantly faster than CMPD’s over the last 12 months.

COGZF's Profit vs Risk Rating (68) in the null industry is in the same range as CMPD (100). This means that COGZF’s stock grew similarly to CMPD’s over the last 12 months.

CMPD's SMR Rating (3) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for COGZF (67). This means that CMPD’s stock grew somewhat faster than COGZF’s over the last 12 months.

CMPD's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as COGZF (43). This means that CMPD’s stock grew similarly to COGZF’s over the last 12 months.

CMPD's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for COGZF (54). This means that CMPD’s stock grew somewhat faster than COGZF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMPDCOGZF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
67%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
88%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CMPD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
COGZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HLRRX9.950.09
+0.91%
LDR Real Estate Value Opportunity Instl
TFOIX50.13N/A
N/A
Transamerica Capital Growth I
GRHAX16.21N/A
N/A
Goehring & Rozencwajg Resources Retail
JEPCX14.13N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Equity Premium Income C
ISCTX19.25N/A
N/A
Voya SmallCap Opportunities Port S2

CMPD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMPD has been loosely correlated with OCLCF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CMPD jumps, then OCLCF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMPD
1D Price
Change %
CMPD100%
-15.45%
OCLCF - CMPD
33%
Loosely correlated
N/A
PMCUF - CMPD
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IARGF - CMPD
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
COGZF - CMPD
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CINGF - CMPD
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.09%
More

COGZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that COGZF and CIOXY have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that COGZF and CIOXY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COGZF
1D Price
Change %
COGZF100%
N/A
CIOXY - COGZF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RAMP - COGZF
20%
Poorly correlated
+2.20%
CMPD - COGZF
12%
Poorly correlated
-15.45%
CNSWF - COGZF
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.26%
DASTF - COGZF
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.44%
More