It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CMP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePLL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CMP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
CMP (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -18.38% price change this week, while PLL (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -17.31% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -1.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.17%.
CMP is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2025.
PLL is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2025.
The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.
CMP | PLL | CMP / PLL | |
Capitalization | 643M | 257M | 250% |
EBITDA | 106M | -18.36M | -577% |
Gain YTD | -57.611 | -69.040 | 83% |
P/E Ratio | 60.97 | N/A | - |
Revenue | 1.19B | 39.8M | 3,000% |
Total Cash | 38.3M | 72.2M | 53% |
Total Debt | 914M | 1.57M | 58,365% |
CMP | PLL | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 52 | 54 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 11 Undervalued | 33 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 96 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 94 | 92 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 87 | 64 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 96 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CMP's Valuation (11) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is in the same range as PLL (33) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry. This means that CMP’s stock grew similarly to PLL’s over the last 12 months.
PLL's Profit vs Risk Rating (96) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is in the same range as CMP (100) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that PLL’s stock grew similarly to CMP’s over the last 12 months.
PLL's SMR Rating (92) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is in the same range as CMP (94) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that PLL’s stock grew similarly to CMP’s over the last 12 months.
PLL's Price Growth Rating (64) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is in the same range as CMP (87) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that PLL’s stock grew similarly to CMP’s over the last 12 months.
CMP's P/E Growth Rating (96) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is in the same range as PLL (100) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry. This means that CMP’s stock grew similarly to PLL’s over the last 12 months.
CMP | |
---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago84% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago81% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago78% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago73% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago75% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago74% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago75% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago79% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago69% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago75% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMP has been loosely correlated with MTRN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CMP jumps, then MTRN could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CMP | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CMP | 100% | -5.83% | ||
MTRN - CMP | 46% Loosely correlated | -0.45% | ||
RIO - CMP | 37% Loosely correlated | -0.15% | ||
MP - CMP | 33% Poorly correlated | -2.10% | ||
SGML - CMP | 31% Poorly correlated | +1.01% | ||
PLL - CMP | 31% Poorly correlated | -2.40% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PLL has been loosely correlated with LAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PLL jumps, then LAC could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PLL | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
PLL | 100% | -2.40% | ||
LAC - PLL | 54% Loosely correlated | +1.02% | ||
SGML - PLL | 48% Loosely correlated | +1.01% | ||
MP - PLL | 45% Loosely correlated | -2.10% | ||
VALE - PLL | 45% Loosely correlated | +1.37% | ||
MTRN - PLL | 43% Loosely correlated | -0.45% | ||
More |