CMP
Price
$12.00
Change
-$0.25 (-2.04%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
Earnings call today
PLL
Price
$11.95
Change
-$1.40 (-10.49%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
103 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CMP vs PLL

Header iconCMP vs PLL Comparison
Open Charts CMP vs PLLBanner chart's image
Compass Minerals International
Price$12.00
Change-$0.25 (-2.04%)
Volume$652.84K
CapitalizationN/A
Piedmont Lithium
Price$11.95
Change-$1.40 (-10.49%)
Volume$806.95K
CapitalizationN/A
CMP vs PLL Comparison Chart
Loading...
CMP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
PLL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMP vs. PLL commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMP is a Hold and PLL is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (CMP: $12.00 vs. PLL: $11.95)
Brand notoriety: CMP and PLL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMP: 65% vs. PLL: 81%
Market capitalization -- CMP: $642.8M vs. PLL: $256.53M
CMP [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $642.8M. PLL’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $256.53M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePLL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CMP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PLL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, PLL is a better buy in the long-term than CMP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PLL’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • PLL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CMP and PLL are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CMP (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -9.09% price change this week, while PLL (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -1.40% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -2.84%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.91%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.92%.

Reported Earning Dates

CMP is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2025.

PLL is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (-2.84% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMP($643M) has a higher market cap than PLL($257M). CMP YTD gains are higher at: -52.282 vs. PLL (-57.669). CMP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 106M vs. PLL (-18.36M). PLL has more cash in the bank: 72.2M vs. CMP (38.3M). PLL has less debt than CMP: PLL (1.57M) vs CMP (914M). CMP has higher revenues than PLL: CMP (1.19B) vs PLL (39.8M).
CMPPLLCMP / PLL
Capitalization643M257M250%
EBITDA106M-18.36M-577%
Gain YTD-52.282-57.66991%
P/E Ratio60.97N/A-
Revenue1.19B39.8M3,000%
Total Cash38.3M72.2M53%
Total Debt914M1.57M58,365%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMP vs PLL: Fundamental Ratings
CMP
PLL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
588
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
11
Undervalued
34
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10092
SMR RATING
1..100
9392
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5647
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
95100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
22n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CMP's Valuation (11) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is in the same range as PLL (34) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry. This means that CMP’s stock grew similarly to PLL’s over the last 12 months.

PLL's Profit vs Risk Rating (92) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is in the same range as CMP (100) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that PLL’s stock grew similarly to CMP’s over the last 12 months.

PLL's SMR Rating (92) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is in the same range as CMP (93) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that PLL’s stock grew similarly to CMP’s over the last 12 months.

PLL's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is in the same range as CMP (56) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that PLL’s stock grew similarly to CMP’s over the last 12 months.

CMP's P/E Growth Rating (95) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is in the same range as PLL (100) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry. This means that CMP’s stock grew similarly to PLL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMPPLL
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
0%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
0%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CMP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
PLL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.370.91
+3.44%
GameStop Corp
AAPL228.223.10
+1.38%
Apple
SPY593.35-3.84
-0.64%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X87250.430000-3333.734400
-3.68%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA311.18-19.06
-5.77%
Tesla

CMP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMP has been loosely correlated with MTRN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CMP jumps, then MTRN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMP
1D Price
Change %
CMP100%
-2.04%
MTRN - CMP
46%
Loosely correlated
-2.37%
PLL - CMP
37%
Loosely correlated
-10.49%
MP - CMP
37%
Loosely correlated
-2.88%
RIO - CMP
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.31%
HBM - CMP
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.16%
More

PLL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PLL has been loosely correlated with LAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PLL jumps, then LAC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PLL
1D Price
Change %
PLL100%
-10.49%
LAC - PLL
55%
Loosely correlated
-8.29%
MP - PLL
51%
Loosely correlated
-2.88%
SGML - PLL
49%
Loosely correlated
-8.93%
HBM - PLL
46%
Loosely correlated
-1.16%
VALE - PLL
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.61%
More