Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMNIX vs WMNIX
CMNIX vs WMNIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMNIX vs. WMNIX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMNIX is a Buy and WMNIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMNIX has more cash in the bank: 16.9B vs. WMNIX (130M). WMNIX pays higher dividends than CMNIX: WMNIX (2.32) vs CMNIX (1.86). CMNIX was incepted earlier than WMNIX: CMNIX (25 years) vs WMNIX (10 years). WMNIX (1.22) is less costly to investors than CMNIX (0.97). WMNIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. CMNIX (35.00). WMNIX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMNIX: WMNIX (100000) vs CMNIX (1000000). WMNIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.38 vs. CMNIX (6.98). WMNIX return over 5 years is better than : 24.80 vs. CMNIX (21.22).
| CMNIX | WMNIX | CMNIX / WMNIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 0.99 | 98% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 1.22 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.921 | 6.856 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 16.9B | 130M | 13,000% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.86 | 2.32 | 80% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.98 | 7.38 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.47 | 22.99 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.22 | 24.80 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.88 | 40.21 | 97% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement