Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMNIX vs QDARX
CMNIX vs QDARX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMNIX vs. QDARX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMNIX is a Buy and QDARX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMNIX has more cash in the bank: 16.3B vs. QDARX (1.89B). CMNIX pays higher dividends than QDARX: CMNIX (1.92) vs QDARX (1.26). CMNIX was incepted earlier than QDARX: CMNIX (25 years) vs QDARX (11 years). QDARX (1.78) is less costly to investors than CMNIX (0.97). QDARX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 361.00 vs. CMNIX (35.00). CMNIX has a lower initial minimum investment than QDARX: CMNIX (1000000) vs QDARX (50000000). CMNIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.76 vs. QDARX (5.90). QDARX return over 5 years is better than : 39.06 vs. CMNIX (21.19).
| CMNIX | QDARX | CMNIX / QDARX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 1.77 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 1.78 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.118 | 5.202 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 50000000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 16.3B | 1.89B | 861% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.92 | 1.26 | 152% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.76 | 5.90 | 132% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.97 | 13.88 | 137% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.19 | 39.06 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.64 | 79.43 | 45% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers