Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMNIX vs QDARX
CMNIX vs QDARX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMNIX vs. QDARX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMNIX is a Buy and QDARX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMNIX has more cash in the bank: 17.1B vs. QDARX (2.08B). CMNIX pays higher dividends than QDARX: CMNIX (1.84) vs QDARX (1.23). CMNIX was incepted earlier than QDARX: CMNIX (26 years) vs QDARX (11 years). QDARX (1.78) is less costly to investors than CMNIX (0.97). QDARX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 361.00 vs. CMNIX (35.00). CMNIX has a lower initial minimum investment than QDARX: CMNIX (1000000) vs QDARX (50000000). QDARX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.31 vs. CMNIX (6.88). QDARX return over 5 years is better than : 28.18 vs. CMNIX (20.83).
| CMNIX | QDARX | CMNIX / QDARX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 1.77 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 1.78 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.663 | 7.680 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 50000000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 17.1B | 2.08B | 821% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.84 | 1.23 | 150% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.88 | 8.31 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.51 | 16.36 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.83 | 28.18 | 74% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.10 | 90.31 | 43% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement