Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMNIX vs PSCIX
CMNIX vs PSCIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMNIX vs. PSCIX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMNIX is a Buy and PSCIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMNIX has more cash in the bank: 17B vs. PSCIX (338M). PSCIX pays higher dividends than CMNIX: PSCIX (4.38) vs CMNIX (1.84). CMNIX was incepted earlier than PSCIX: CMNIX (26 years) vs PSCIX (13 years). PSCIX (1.88) is less costly to investors than CMNIX (0.97). PSCIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 172.00 vs. CMNIX (35.00). PSCIX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMNIX: PSCIX (100000) vs CMNIX (1000000). PSCIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.76 vs. CMNIX (7.10). CMNIX return over 5 years is better than : 20.95 vs. PSCIX (13.51).
| CMNIX | PSCIX | CMNIX / PSCIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 1.28 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 1.88 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.461 | 6.891 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 17B | 338M | 5,030% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.84 | 4.38 | 42% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.10 | 7.76 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.50 | 26.26 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.95 | 13.51 | 155% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.13 | 41.52 | 97% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement