CMND vs THAR
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMND is a StrongBuy and THAR is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CMND’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTHAR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CMND’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- THAR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CMND’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while THAR’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CMND’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- THAR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
CMND (@Biotechnology) experienced а -14.58% price change this week, while THAR (@Biotechnology) price change was -3.39% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Biotechnology industry was +3.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.06%.
Reported Earning Dates
THAR is expected to report earnings on Feb 28, 2024.
Industries' Descriptions
@Biotechnology (+3.80% weekly)Biotechnology involves genetic or protein engineering to produce medicines/therapies for treating and preventing ailments. The industry also provides crucial ingredients for diagnostics. This multi-billion-dollar industry is heavily focused on research and development, as companies attempt to continually come up with cutting-edge solutions for health. New discoveries for the treatment of diseases provide opportunities for growth for a company in this industry. Discoveries, however, must pass the regulatory approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) before they can make it to markets. Amgen Inc., Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Celgene Corporation are examples of companies in this industry.
| CMND | THAR | CMND / THAR | |
| Capitalization | 5.07M | 2.81M | 180% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -56.228 | -62.672 | 90% |
| P/E Ratio | 0.17 | 0.12 | 141% |
| Revenue | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | 129K | 8.43M | 2% |
| Total Debt | 94.2K | 560K | 17% |
| CMND | THAR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | about 1 month ago 0% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | about 1 month ago 0% | about 1 month ago 0% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | about 1 month ago 0% | about 1 month ago 0% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | about 1 month ago 0% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | about 1 month ago 0% | about 1 month ago 0% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | about 1 month ago 0% | about 1 month ago 0% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | about 2 months ago 82% | about 2 months ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | about 2 months ago 90% | about 1 month ago 0% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | about 1 month ago 0% | about 1 month ago 0% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | about 1 month ago 0% | about 1 month ago 0% |
CMND and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMND has been closely correlated with SEEL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CMND jumps, then SEEL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CMND | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CMND | 100% | -6.11% | ||
| SEEL - CMND | 86% Closely correlated | -9.97% | ||
| THAR - CMND | 47% Loosely correlated | +4.78% | ||
| CYTO - CMND | 36% Loosely correlated | +0.77% | ||
| BIVI - CMND | 34% Loosely correlated | -3.96% | ||
| SLRN - CMND | 28% Poorly correlated | -4.39% | ||
More | ||||
THAR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, THAR has been closely correlated with PIRS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if THAR jumps, then PIRS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To THAR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| THAR | 100% | +4.78% | ||
| PIRS - THAR | 84% Closely correlated | -5.16% | ||
| CDTX - THAR | 82% Closely correlated | -2.52% | ||
| NBY - THAR | 81% Closely correlated | -0.43% | ||
| RNAC - THAR | 81% Closely correlated | -6.02% | ||
| NCNA - THAR | 81% Closely correlated | -7.10% | ||
More | ||||