Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMLIX vs GFFFX
CMLIX vs GFFFX Comparison
Open Charts CMLIX vs GFFFX
Congress Large Cap Growth Institutional
Price$51.84
Change-$0.09 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets589.3M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$85.79
Change+$0.89 (+1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
CMLIX vs GFFFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMLIX vs. GFFFX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMLIX is a StrongBuy and GFFFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. CMLIX (589M). GFFFX pays higher dividends than CMLIX: GFFFX (0.51) vs CMLIX (0.07). CMLIX was incepted earlier than GFFFX: CMLIX (98 years) vs GFFFX (17 years). CMLIX (0.68) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). GFFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. CMLIX (19.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMLIX: GFFFX (250) vs CMLIX (100000). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.73 vs. CMLIX (11.83). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 43.50 vs. CMLIX (33.50).
| CMLIX | GFFFX | CMLIX / GFFFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.40 | 170% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.40 | 170% |
| Fund Existence | 98 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.746 | 15.936 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 589M | 332B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.51 | 13% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.83 | 18.73 | 63% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.49 | 60.96 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.50 | 43.50 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 140.49 | 101.61 | 138% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement