Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMLIX vs GFAFX
CMLIX vs GFAFX Comparison
Open Charts CMLIX vs GFAFX
Congress Large Cap Growth Institutional
Price$49.07
Change-$0.78 (-1.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets579.26M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$87.79
Change-$1.38 (-1.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
CMLIX vs GFAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMLIX vs. GFAFX commentary
Dec 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMLIX is a Buy and GFAFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. CMLIX (579M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than CMLIX: GFAFX (0.28) vs CMLIX (0.07). CMLIX was incepted earlier than GFAFX: CMLIX (98 years) vs GFAFX (25 years). CMLIX (0.68) and GFAFX (0.65) have similar cost to investors . GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. CMLIX (19.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMLIX: GFAFX (250) vs CMLIX (100000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.77 vs. CMLIX (-4.36). CMLIX (35.00) and GFAFX (33.49) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CMLIX | GFAFX | CMLIX / GFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.65 | 105% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.65 | 105% |
| Fund Existence | 98 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.494 | 20.892 | 31% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 579M | 339B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.28 | 23% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.36 | 6.77 | -64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.85 | 68.79 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.00 | 33.49 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | 123.72 | 103.71 | 119% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers