Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMLIX vs GFAFX
CMLIX vs GFAFX Comparison
Open Charts CMLIX vs GFAFX
Congress Large Cap Growth Institutional
Price$52.16
Change+$0.29 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets588.59M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$86.98
Change+$0.17 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.91B
CMLIX vs GFAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMLIX vs. GFAFX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMLIX is a Buy and GFAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. CMLIX (589M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than CMLIX: GFAFX (0.29) vs CMLIX (0.07). CMLIX was incepted earlier than GFAFX: CMLIX (98 years) vs GFAFX (25 years). CMLIX (0.68) and GFAFX (0.67) have similar cost to investors . GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. CMLIX (19.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMLIX: GFAFX (250) vs CMLIX (100000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.53 vs. CMLIX (6.20). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 40.02 vs. CMLIX (30.80).
| CMLIX | GFAFX | CMLIX / GFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.67 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.67 | 101% |
| Fund Existence | 98 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.429 | 17.923 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 589M | 337B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.29 | 23% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.20 | 11.53 | 54% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.29 | 72.21 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.80 | 40.02 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 136.70 | 100.61 | 136% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement