Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMLIX vs GFACX
CMLIX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts CMLIX vs GFACX
Congress Large Cap Growth Institutional
Price$49.07
Change-$0.78 (-1.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets579.26M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$75.39
Change-$1.18 (-1.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
CMLIX vs GFACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMLIX vs. GFACX commentary
Dec 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMLIX is a Buy and GFACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. CMLIX (579M). CMLIX pays higher dividends than GFACX: CMLIX (0.07) vs GFACX (0.00). CMLIX was incepted earlier than GFACX: CMLIX (98 years) vs GFACX (25 years). GFACX (1.35) is less costly to investors than CMLIX (0.68). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. CMLIX (19.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMLIX: GFACX (250) vs CMLIX (100000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.75 vs. CMLIX (-4.36). CMLIX return over 5 years is better than : 35.00 vs. GFACX (24.59).
| CMLIX | GFACX | CMLIX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.35 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.35 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 98 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.494 | 20.091 | 32% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 579M | 339B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.36 | 4.75 | -92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.85 | 61.47 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.00 | 24.59 | 142% |
| Returns for 10 years | 123.72 | 83.45 | 148% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers