CMHF
Price
$27.00
Change
+$1.53 (+6.01%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
CMUV
Price
$24.10
Change
+$0.21 (+0.88%)
Updated
Jul 18 closing price
Capitalization
26.39M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CMHF vs CMUV

Header iconCMHF vs CMUV Comparison
Open Charts CMHF vs CMUVBanner chart's image
Community Heritage Financial
Price$27.00
Change+$1.53 (+6.01%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
CMUV Ban
Price$24.10
Change+$0.21 (+0.88%)
Volume$340
Capitalization26.39M
CMHF vs CMUV Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CMHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CMUV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMHF vs. CMUV commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMHF is a Hold and CMUV is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (CMHF: $27.00 vs. CMUV: $24.10)
Brand notoriety: CMHF and CMUV are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMHF: 22% vs. CMUV: 22%
Market capitalization -- CMHF: $0 vs. CMUV: $26.39M
CMHF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $0. CMUV’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $26.39M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMHF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCMUV’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CMHF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CMUV’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CMHF is a better buy in the long-term than CMUV.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMHF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CMUV’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMHF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • CMUV’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CMHF is a better buy in the short-term than CMUV.

Price Growth

CMHF (@Regional Banks) experienced а +6.01% price change this week, while CMUV (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.19%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.51% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMUV YTD gains are higher at: 18.247 vs. CMHF (13.239).
CMHFCMUVCMHF / CMUV
CapitalizationN/A26.4M-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD13.23918.24773%
P/E RatioN/A7.39-
RevenueN/A11.7M-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMHF vs CMUV: Fundamental Ratings
CMHF
CMUV
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
47
Fair valued
75
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
484
SMR RATING
1..100
552
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4647
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1131
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CMHF's Valuation (47) in the null industry is in the same range as CMUV (75). This means that CMHF’s stock grew similarly to CMUV’s over the last 12 months.

CMUV's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMHF (48). This means that CMUV’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMHF’s over the last 12 months.

CMHF's SMR Rating (5) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMUV (52). This means that CMHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMUV’s over the last 12 months.

CMHF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as CMUV (47). This means that CMHF’s stock grew similarly to CMUV’s over the last 12 months.

CMHF's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is in the same range as CMUV (31). This means that CMHF’s stock grew similarly to CMUV’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMHFCMUV
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
32%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
20%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
40%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
36%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
40%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
43%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
21%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CMHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CMUV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ITVPY11.77N/A
N/A
ITV Plc.
NPCPF8.12N/A
N/A
Nippon Paint Holdings Co., Ltd.
KNMOF18.13N/A
N/A
Kanamoto Co Ltd.
WDFCF0.09N/A
N/A
K9 Gold Corp.
NRXBF0.52N/A
-0.54%
NUREXONE BIOLOGIC INC

CMHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMHF has been loosely correlated with CDAB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CMHF jumps, then CDAB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMHF
1D Price
Change %
CMHF100%
+6.01%
CDAB - CMHF
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
KEY - CMHF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.38%
FGBI - CMHF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.82%
WTBFA - CMHF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BXRBF - CMHF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CMUV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CMUV and SVBT have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CMUV and SVBT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMUV
1D Price
Change %
CMUV100%
N/A
SVBT - CMUV
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CMHF - CMUV
10%
Poorly correlated
+6.01%
CIWV - CMUV
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CNBB - CMUV
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CIXPF - CMUV
-1%
Poorly correlated
+3.79%
More