CMGGF
Price
$1.57
Change
+$0.24 (+18.05%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
6.1B
80 days until earnings call
EXSR
Price
$109.00
Change
-$1.00 (-0.91%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
186.86M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CMGGF vs EXSR

Header iconCMGGF vs EXSR Comparison
Open Charts CMGGF vs EXSRBanner chart's image
Commercial International Bank
Price$1.57
Change+$0.24 (+18.05%)
Volume$300
Capitalization6.1B
Exchange Bank (Santa Rosa, CA)
Price$109.00
Change-$1.00 (-0.91%)
Volume$1.7K
Capitalization186.86M
CMGGF vs EXSR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EXSR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMGGF vs. EXSR commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMGGF is a Buy and EXSR is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (CMGGF: $1.47 vs. EXSR: $109.00)
Brand notoriety: CMGGF and EXSR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMGGF: 100% vs. EXSR: 300%
Market capitalization -- CMGGF: $6.1B vs. EXSR: $186.86M
CMGGF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $6.1B. EXSR’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $186.86M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $174.7B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.93B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMGGF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileEXSR’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CMGGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • EXSR’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, EXSR is a better buy in the long-term than CMGGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EXSR’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • EXSR’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

CMGGF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while EXSR (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.59% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.68%.

Reported Earning Dates

CMGGF is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.64% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMGGF($6.1B) has a higher market cap than EXSR($187M). EXSR YTD gains are higher at: 3.158 vs. CMGGF (0.000). EXSR has less debt than CMGGF: EXSR (175M) vs CMGGF (36.2B).
CMGGFEXSRCMGGF / EXSR
Capitalization6.1B187M3,260%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.0003.158-
P/E Ratio5.90N/A-
Revenue99BN/A-
Total CashN/A35.2M-
Total Debt36.2B175M20,686%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMGGF vs EXSR: Fundamental Ratings
CMGGF
EXSR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
407
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
85
Overvalued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10079
SMR RATING
1..100
15
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7056
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7819
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EXSR's Valuation (16) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CMGGF (85). This means that EXSR’s stock grew significantly faster than CMGGF’s over the last 12 months.

EXSR's Profit vs Risk Rating (79) in the null industry is in the same range as CMGGF (100). This means that EXSR’s stock grew similarly to CMGGF’s over the last 12 months.

CMGGF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as EXSR (5). This means that CMGGF’s stock grew similarly to EXSR’s over the last 12 months.

EXSR's Price Growth Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as CMGGF (70). This means that EXSR’s stock grew similarly to CMGGF’s over the last 12 months.

EXSR's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMGGF (78). This means that EXSR’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMGGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMGGFEXSR
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
48%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
17%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
15%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
47%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
39%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EXSR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FAPHX13.400.05
+0.37%
Fidelity Healthy Future
HFQDX7.03N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson Global Equity Income D
BUFDX33.76-0.09
-0.27%
Buffalo Growth & Income
GMLPX38.57-0.20
-0.52%
Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infras Instl
MFCAX40.30-0.27
-0.67%
Meridian Contrarian A

CMGGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMGGF has been loosely correlated with SUGBY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CMGGF jumps, then SUGBY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMGGF
1D Price
Change %
CMGGF100%
N/A
SUGBY - CMGGF
54%
Loosely correlated
N/A
FSBH - CMGGF
44%
Loosely correlated
+1.38%
MBKL - CMGGF
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BEOB - CMGGF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EXSR - CMGGF
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.91%
More

EXSR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EXSR has been loosely correlated with SUGBY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EXSR jumps, then SUGBY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EXSR
1D Price
Change %
EXSR100%
-0.91%
SUGBY - EXSR
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CMGGF - EXSR
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BEOB - EXSR
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FSUN - EXSR
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.25%
FDBC - EXSR
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.41%
More