It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CMG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTXRH’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CMG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TXRH’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
CMG (@Restaurants) experienced а -2.02% price change this week, while TXRH (@Restaurants) price change was -1.48% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +0.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.53%.
CMG is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.
TXRH is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.
The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.
CMG | TXRH | CMG / TXRH | |
Capitalization | 56B | 11.4B | 491% |
EBITDA | 2.35B | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | -30.697 | -3.819 | 804% |
P/E Ratio | 36.98 | 26.17 | 141% |
Revenue | 11.6B | N/A | - |
Total Cash | 1.55B | N/A | - |
Total Debt | 4.78B | 923M | 518% |
CMG | TXRH | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 63 | 7 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 83 Overvalued | 69 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 58 | 17 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 22 | 30 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | 63 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 85 | 67 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 35 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TXRH's Valuation (69) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as CMG (83). This means that TXRH’s stock grew similarly to CMG’s over the last 12 months.
TXRH's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMG (58). This means that TXRH’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMG’s over the last 12 months.
CMG's SMR Rating (22) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as TXRH (30). This means that CMG’s stock grew similarly to TXRH’s over the last 12 months.
TXRH's Price Growth Rating (63) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as CMG (64). This means that TXRH’s stock grew similarly to CMG’s over the last 12 months.
TXRH's P/E Growth Rating (67) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as CMG (85). This means that TXRH’s stock grew similarly to CMG’s over the last 12 months.
CMG | TXRH | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago68% | 1 day ago69% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago65% | 1 day ago77% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago61% | 1 day ago58% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago65% | 1 day ago65% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago60% | 1 day ago57% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago60% | 1 day ago61% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 23 days ago62% | 14 days ago68% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago60% | 10 days ago52% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago69% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago63% | 1 day ago64% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
BCAT | 15.06 | 0.12 | +0.80% |
BlackRock Capital Allocation Term Trust | |||
MMLG | 34.69 | 0.22 | +0.63% |
First Trust Multi-Manager Large Gr ETF | |||
KSPY | 27.69 | 0.16 | +0.58% |
KraneShares Hedgeye Hedged Eq Idx ETF | |||
CWEB | 48.14 | 0.06 | +0.12% |
Direxion Dly CSI CHN Itnet Bull 2X Shrs | |||
BNGE | 38.68 | N/A | N/A |
First Trust S-Network Strmng & Gmng ETF |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMG has been loosely correlated with SG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CMG jumps, then SG could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CMG | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CMG | 100% | +0.10% | ||
SG - CMG | 51% Loosely correlated | +1.14% | ||
WING - CMG | 49% Loosely correlated | +1.32% | ||
KRUS - CMG | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.51% | ||
SBUX - CMG | 43% Loosely correlated | -2.82% | ||
CAVA - CMG | 40% Loosely correlated | +0.52% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TXRH has been loosely correlated with CAKE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TXRH jumps, then CAKE could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TXRH | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
TXRH | 100% | +0.17% | ||
CAKE - TXRH | 64% Loosely correlated | +1.00% | ||
BJRI - TXRH | 62% Loosely correlated | +2.08% | ||
DRI - TXRH | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.10% | ||
SHAK - TXRH | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.39% | ||
EAT - TXRH | 53% Loosely correlated | +2.05% | ||
More |