CMG vs SHAK
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMG is a Buy and SHAK is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CMG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSHAK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CMG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SHAK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CMG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SHAK’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CMG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- SHAK’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
CMG (@Restaurants) experienced а -8.28% price change this week, while SHAK (@Restaurants) price change was -13.97% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -3.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.12%.
Reported Earning Dates
CMG is expected to report earnings on Apr 29, 2025.
SHAK is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Restaurants (-3.23% weekly)The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.
| CMG | SHAK | CMG / SHAK | |
| Capitalization | 67.5B | 3.54B | 1,905% |
| EBITDA | 2.32B | 121M | 1,917% |
| Gain YTD | -17.363 | -31.880 | 54% |
| P/E Ratio | 44.89 | 368.42 | 12% |
| Revenue | 11.3B | 1.25B | 902% |
| Total Cash | 1.42B | 321M | 443% |
| Total Debt | 4.54B | 810M | 561% |
CMG | SHAK | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 65 | 60 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 84 Overvalued | 97 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 15 | 78 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 22 | 89 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 92 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 79 | 9 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 95 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CMG's Valuation (84) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as SHAK (97). This means that CMG’s stock grew similarly to SHAK’s over the last 12 months.
CMG's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SHAK (78). This means that CMG’s stock grew somewhat faster than SHAK’s over the last 12 months.
CMG's SMR Rating (22) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for SHAK (89). This means that CMG’s stock grew significantly faster than SHAK’s over the last 12 months.
CMG's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SHAK (92). This means that CMG’s stock grew somewhat faster than SHAK’s over the last 12 months.
SHAK's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for CMG (79). This means that SHAK’s stock grew significantly faster than CMG’s over the last 12 months.
| CMG | SHAK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 67% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 65% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 75% |
CMG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMG has been loosely correlated with WING. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CMG jumps, then WING could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CMG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CMG | 100% | -0.80% | ||
| WING - CMG | 48% Loosely correlated | -5.87% | ||
| DPZ - CMG | 35% Loosely correlated | -6.78% | ||
| SG - CMG | 29% Poorly correlated | -0.29% | ||
| TXRH - CMG | 29% Poorly correlated | -0.39% | ||
| KRUS - CMG | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.86% | ||
More | ||||
SHAK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SHAK has been loosely correlated with CAVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SHAK jumps, then CAVA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SHAK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHAK | 100% | -4.35% | ||
| CAVA - SHAK | 43% Loosely correlated | -4.37% | ||
| TXRH - SHAK | 35% Loosely correlated | -0.39% | ||
| EAT - SHAK | 34% Loosely correlated | -0.78% | ||
| GENK - SHAK | 34% Loosely correlated | -9.28% | ||
| SG - SHAK | 33% Poorly correlated | -0.29% | ||
More | ||||