CMG
Price
$39.55
Change
-$0.13 (-0.33%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
53.03B
34 days until earnings call
SBUX
Price
$84.27
Change
-$1.42 (-1.66%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
95.79B
35 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CMG vs SBUX

Header iconCMG vs SBUX Comparison
Open Charts CMG vs SBUXBanner chart's image
Chipotle Mexican Grill
Price$39.55
Change-$0.13 (-0.33%)
Volume$21.06M
Capitalization53.03B
Starbucks
Price$84.27
Change-$1.42 (-1.66%)
Volume$9.66M
Capitalization95.79B
CMG vs SBUX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CMG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SBUX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMG vs. SBUX commentary
Sep 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMG is a Buy and SBUX is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 25, 2025
Stock price -- (CMG: $39.55 vs. SBUX: $84.27)
Brand notoriety: CMG and SBUX are both notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMG: 97% vs. SBUX: 95%
Market capitalization -- CMG: $53.03B vs. SBUX: $95.79B
CMG [@Restaurants] is valued at $53.03B. SBUX’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $95.79B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $217.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $7.71B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSBUX’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CMG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SBUX’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, SBUX is a better buy in the long-term than CMG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SBUX’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SBUX’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CMG is a better buy in the short-term than SBUX.

Price Growth

CMG (@Restaurants) experienced а -0.30% price change this week, while SBUX (@Restaurants) price change was +1.26% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -0.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.98%.

Reported Earning Dates

CMG is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

SBUX is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-0.11% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SBUX($95.8B) has a higher market cap than CMG($53B). SBUX (36.48) and CMG (35.00) have similar P/E ratio . SBUX YTD gains are higher at: -5.877 vs. CMG (-34.411). SBUX has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.79B vs. CMG (2.35B). SBUX has more cash in the bank: 4.51B vs. CMG (1.55B). CMG has less debt than SBUX: CMG (4.78B) vs SBUX (27.9B). SBUX has higher revenues than CMG: SBUX (36.7B) vs CMG (11.6B).
CMGSBUXCMG / SBUX
Capitalization53B95.8B55%
EBITDA2.35B5.79B41%
Gain YTD-34.411-5.877585%
P/E Ratio35.0036.4896%
Revenue11.6B36.7B32%
Total Cash1.55B4.51B34%
Total Debt4.78B27.9B17%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMG vs SBUX: Fundamental Ratings
CMG
SBUX
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
310
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
82
Overvalued
26
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6783
SMR RATING
1..100
2210
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6562
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8817
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SBUX's Valuation (26) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMG (82). This means that SBUX’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMG’s over the last 12 months.

CMG's Profit vs Risk Rating (67) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as SBUX (83). This means that CMG’s stock grew similarly to SBUX’s over the last 12 months.

SBUX's SMR Rating (10) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as CMG (22). This means that SBUX’s stock grew similarly to CMG’s over the last 12 months.

SBUX's Price Growth Rating (62) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as CMG (65). This means that SBUX’s stock grew similarly to CMG’s over the last 12 months.

SBUX's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for CMG (88). This means that SBUX’s stock grew significantly faster than CMG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMGSBUX
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CMG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SBUX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ALMU19.150.88
+4.82%
AELUMA INC
HSPO12.32N/A
N/A
Horizon Space Acquisition I Corp
R184.58-2.07
-1.11%
Ryder System
AVDL15.59-0.22
-1.39%
Avadel Pharmaceuticals plc
BHFAP16.80-0.43
-2.47%
Brighthouse Financial

CMG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMG has been loosely correlated with SG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CMG jumps, then SG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMG
1D Price
Change %
CMG100%
-0.33%
SG - CMG
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.24%
WING - CMG
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.39%
KRUS - CMG
45%
Loosely correlated
-2.42%
SBUX - CMG
43%
Loosely correlated
-1.66%
CAVA - CMG
41%
Loosely correlated
-2.64%
More

SBUX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SBUX has been loosely correlated with SHAK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SBUX jumps, then SHAK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SBUX
1D Price
Change %
SBUX100%
-1.66%
SHAK - SBUX
48%
Loosely correlated
-2.79%
KRUS - SBUX
44%
Loosely correlated
-2.42%
EAT - SBUX
43%
Loosely correlated
-1.24%
CMG - SBUX
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.33%
CAKE - SBUX
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.90%
More