CMG
Price
$40.08
Change
+$0.75 (+1.91%)
Updated
Sep 26, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
53.74B
32 days until earnings call
NATH
Price
$109.01
Change
+$2.26 (+2.12%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
445.8M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CMG vs NATH

Header iconCMG vs NATH Comparison
Open Charts CMG vs NATHBanner chart's image
Chipotle Mexican Grill
Price$40.08
Change+$0.75 (+1.91%)
Volume$151.19K
Capitalization53.74B
Nathan's Famous
Price$109.01
Change+$2.26 (+2.12%)
Volume$23.54K
Capitalization445.8M
CMG vs NATH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CMG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NATH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMG vs. NATH commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMG is a Buy and NATH is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (CMG: $40.08 vs. NATH: $109.01)
Brand notoriety: CMG: Notable vs. NATH: Not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMG: 69% vs. NATH: 77%
Market capitalization -- CMG: $53.74B vs. NATH: $445.8M
CMG [@Restaurants] is valued at $53.74B. NATH’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $445.8M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $217.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $7.73B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNATH’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CMG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NATH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, NATH is a better buy in the long-term than CMG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NATH’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • NATH’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CMG is a better buy in the short-term than NATH.

Price Growth

CMG (@Restaurants) experienced а +1.93% price change this week, while NATH (@Restaurants) price change was +5.87% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -0.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.41%.

Reported Earning Dates

CMG is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-0.27% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMG($53.7B) has a higher market cap than NATH($446M). CMG has higher P/E ratio than NATH: CMG (35.47) vs NATH (18.93). NATH YTD gains are higher at: 40.663 vs. CMG (-33.532). CMG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.35B vs. NATH (37M). CMG has more cash in the bank: 1.55B vs. NATH (26.9M). NATH has less debt than CMG: NATH (54.9M) vs CMG (4.78B). CMG has higher revenues than NATH: CMG (11.6B) vs NATH (150M).
CMGNATHCMG / NATH
Capitalization53.7B446M12,040%
EBITDA2.35B37M6,341%
Gain YTD-33.53240.663-82%
P/E Ratio35.4718.93187%
Revenue11.6B150M7,733%
Total Cash1.55B26.9M5,747%
Total Debt4.78B54.9M8,709%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMG vs NATH: Fundamental Ratings
CMG
NATH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
312
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
83
Overvalued
60
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6813
SMR RATING
1..100
2240
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6550
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8825
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NATH's Valuation (60) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as CMG (83). This means that NATH’s stock grew similarly to CMG’s over the last 12 months.

NATH's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMG (68). This means that NATH’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMG’s over the last 12 months.

CMG's SMR Rating (22) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as NATH (40). This means that CMG’s stock grew similarly to NATH’s over the last 12 months.

NATH's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as CMG (65). This means that NATH’s stock grew similarly to CMG’s over the last 12 months.

NATH's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMG (88). This means that NATH’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMGNATH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
52%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CMG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NATH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HYTR21.890.03
+0.16%
Counterpoint High Yield Trend ETF
JCPI48.790.03
+0.06%
JPMorgan Inflation Managed Bond ETF
FBND46.28-0.03
-0.06%
Fidelity Total Bond ETF
SAT24.87-0.03
-0.13%
Saratoga Investment Corp
DWMF31.78-0.10
-0.30%
WisdomTree International Mltfctr

CMG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMG has been loosely correlated with SG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CMG jumps, then SG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMG
1D Price
Change %
CMG100%
+1.91%
SG - CMG
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.24%
WING - CMG
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.54%
KRUS - CMG
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.35%
SBUX - CMG
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.52%
CAVA - CMG
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.02%
More

NATH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NATH has been loosely correlated with LOCO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NATH jumps, then LOCO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NATH
1D Price
Change %
NATH100%
+2.12%
LOCO - NATH
37%
Loosely correlated
+1.01%
BROS - NATH
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.49%
RICK - NATH
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.10%
CMG - NATH
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.91%
SHAK - NATH
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.92%
More