CMG
Price
$41.06
Change
-$0.35 (-0.85%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
55.06B
46 days until earnings call
NATH
Price
$105.00
Change
-$0.57 (-0.54%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
429.4M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CMG vs NATH

Header iconCMG vs NATH Comparison
Open Charts CMG vs NATHBanner chart's image
Chipotle Mexican Grill
Price$41.06
Change-$0.35 (-0.85%)
Volume$22.02M
Capitalization55.06B
Nathan's Famous
Price$105.00
Change-$0.57 (-0.54%)
Volume$17.94K
Capitalization429.4M
CMG vs NATH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CMG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NATH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMG vs. NATH commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMG is a Hold and NATH is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CMG: $41.06 vs. NATH: $105.00)
Brand notoriety: CMG: Notable vs. NATH: Not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMG: 123% vs. NATH: 36%
Market capitalization -- CMG: $55.06B vs. NATH: $429.4M
CMG [@Restaurants] is valued at $55.06B. NATH’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $429.4M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $224.34B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $7.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNATH’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CMG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NATH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, NATH is a better buy in the long-term than CMG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NATH’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • NATH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NATH is a better buy in the short-term than CMG.

Price Growth

CMG (@Restaurants) experienced а -2.56% price change this week, while NATH (@Restaurants) price change was +0.29% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.19%.

Reported Earning Dates

CMG is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+0.38% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMG($55.1B) has a higher market cap than NATH($429M). CMG has higher P/E ratio than NATH: CMG (36.34) vs NATH (18.23). NATH YTD gains are higher at: 35.488 vs. CMG (-31.907). CMG has more cash in the bank: 1.55B vs. NATH (8.4M). NATH has less debt than CMG: NATH (55.9M) vs CMG (4.78B).
CMGNATHCMG / NATH
Capitalization55.1B429M12,844%
EBITDA2.35BN/A-
Gain YTD-31.90735.488-90%
P/E Ratio36.3418.23199%
Revenue11.6BN/A-
Total Cash1.55B8.4M18,400%
Total Debt4.78B55.9M8,553%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMG vs NATH: Fundamental Ratings
CMG
NATH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5918
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
58
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5813
SMR RATING
1..100
2240
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6449
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8626
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8511

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NATH's Valuation (58) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as CMG (84). This means that NATH’s stock grew similarly to CMG’s over the last 12 months.

NATH's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMG (58). This means that NATH’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMG’s over the last 12 months.

CMG's SMR Rating (22) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as NATH (40). This means that CMG’s stock grew similarly to NATH’s over the last 12 months.

NATH's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as CMG (64). This means that NATH’s stock grew similarly to CMG’s over the last 12 months.

NATH's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMG (86). This means that NATH’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMGNATH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CMG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NATH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RYHRX42.460.57
+1.36%
Rydex Real Estate H
PGTDX65.890.20
+0.30%
Putnam Global Technology C
FDSCX40.17N/A
N/A
Fidelity Stock Selector Small Cap
TAGFX11.35N/A
N/A
Transamerica Mid Cap Growth R6
PRPAX5.90N/A
N/A
PGIM Jennison Energy Infrastructure A

CMG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMG has been loosely correlated with SG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CMG jumps, then SG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMG
1D Price
Change %
CMG100%
-0.85%
SG - CMG
51%
Loosely correlated
+2.17%
WING - CMG
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.31%
KRUS - CMG
47%
Loosely correlated
-1.96%
SBUX - CMG
43%
Loosely correlated
-1.82%
CAVA - CMG
40%
Loosely correlated
+1.02%
More

NATH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NATH has been loosely correlated with BROS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NATH jumps, then BROS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NATH
1D Price
Change %
NATH100%
-0.54%
BROS - NATH
35%
Loosely correlated
-7.63%
LOCO - NATH
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.67%
PZZA - NATH
33%
Poorly correlated
+1.84%
RICK - NATH
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.03%
CMG - NATH
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.85%
More