CMG
Price
$39.55
Change
-$0.13 (-0.33%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
53.03B
34 days until earnings call
KRUS
Price
$63.54
Change
-$1.57 (-2.41%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
768.45M
41 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CMG vs KRUS

Header iconCMG vs KRUS Comparison
Open Charts CMG vs KRUSBanner chart's image
Chipotle Mexican Grill
Price$39.55
Change-$0.13 (-0.33%)
Volume$21.06M
Capitalization53.03B
Kura Sushi USA
Price$63.54
Change-$1.57 (-2.41%)
Volume$452.95K
Capitalization768.45M
CMG vs KRUS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CMG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KRUS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMG vs. KRUS commentary
Sep 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMG is a Buy and KRUS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 25, 2025
Stock price -- (CMG: $39.55 vs. KRUS: $63.54)
Brand notoriety: CMG: Notable vs. KRUS: Not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMG: 97% vs. KRUS: 181%
Market capitalization -- CMG: $53.03B vs. KRUS: $768.45M
CMG [@Restaurants] is valued at $53.03B. KRUS’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $768.45M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $217.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $7.71B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKRUS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CMG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • KRUS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CMG is a better buy in the long-term than KRUS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KRUS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • KRUS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CMG is a better buy in the short-term than KRUS.

Price Growth

CMG (@Restaurants) experienced а -0.30% price change this week, while KRUS (@Restaurants) price change was -16.59% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -0.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.98%.

Reported Earning Dates

CMG is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

KRUS is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-0.11% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMG($53B) has a higher market cap than KRUS($768M). KRUS has higher P/E ratio than CMG: KRUS (292.35) vs CMG (35.00). KRUS YTD gains are higher at: -29.852 vs. CMG (-34.411). CMG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.35B vs. KRUS (4.17M). CMG has more cash in the bank: 1.55B vs. KRUS (60M). KRUS has less debt than CMG: KRUS (166M) vs CMG (4.78B). CMG has higher revenues than KRUS: CMG (11.6B) vs KRUS (269M).
CMGKRUSCMG / KRUS
Capitalization53B768M6,901%
EBITDA2.35B4.17M56,246%
Gain YTD-34.411-29.852115%
P/E Ratio35.00292.3512%
Revenue11.6B269M4,312%
Total Cash1.55B60M2,577%
Total Debt4.78B166M2,880%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMG vs KRUS: Fundamental Ratings
CMG
KRUS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
354
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
82
Overvalued
100
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6759
SMR RATING
1..100
2293
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6564
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
88100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CMG's Valuation (82) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as KRUS (100) in the null industry. This means that CMG’s stock grew similarly to KRUS’s over the last 12 months.

KRUS's Profit vs Risk Rating (59) in the null industry is in the same range as CMG (67) in the Restaurants industry. This means that KRUS’s stock grew similarly to CMG’s over the last 12 months.

CMG's SMR Rating (22) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for KRUS (93) in the null industry. This means that CMG’s stock grew significantly faster than KRUS’s over the last 12 months.

KRUS's Price Growth Rating (64) in the null industry is in the same range as CMG (65) in the Restaurants industry. This means that KRUS’s stock grew similarly to CMG’s over the last 12 months.

CMG's P/E Growth Rating (88) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as KRUS (100) in the null industry. This means that CMG’s stock grew similarly to KRUS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMGKRUS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
86%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CMG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KRUS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FKUTX25.450.16
+0.63%
Franklin Utilities A1
CBBIX6.85N/A
N/A
AB Relative Value I
ESERX34.74-0.18
-0.52%
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital Sel Eq R6
FTMSX28.04-0.16
-0.57%
FullerThaler Behvrl Mcr-Cp Eq Instl
IVCSX14.49-0.12
-0.82%
Voya Small Company Port I

CMG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMG has been loosely correlated with SG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CMG jumps, then SG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMG
1D Price
Change %
CMG100%
-0.33%
SG - CMG
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.24%
WING - CMG
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.39%
KRUS - CMG
45%
Loosely correlated
-2.42%
SBUX - CMG
43%
Loosely correlated
-1.66%
CAVA - CMG
41%
Loosely correlated
-2.64%
More

KRUS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KRUS has been loosely correlated with CAKE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KRUS jumps, then CAKE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KRUS
1D Price
Change %
KRUS100%
-2.42%
CAKE - KRUS
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.90%
TXRH - KRUS
52%
Loosely correlated
+1.32%
SHAK - KRUS
52%
Loosely correlated
-2.79%
BJRI - KRUS
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.07%
FWRG - KRUS
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.38%
More