CMEIF
Price
$0.25
Change
-$0.07 (-21.88%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
352.05M
VRM
Price
$26.69
Change
-$0.35 (-1.29%)
Updated
Sep 5, 10:30 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
140.13M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CMEIF vs VRM

Header iconCMEIF vs VRM Comparison
Open Charts CMEIF vs VRMBanner chart's image
China Meidong Auto
Price$0.25
Change-$0.07 (-21.88%)
Volume$100
Capitalization352.05M
Vroom
Price$26.69
Change-$0.35 (-1.29%)
VolumeN/A
Capitalization140.13M
CMEIF vs VRM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CMEIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VRM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMEIF vs. VRM commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMEIF is a Buy and VRM is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CMEIF: $0.25 vs. VRM: $27.04)
Brand notoriety: CMEIF and VRM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Automotive Aftermarket industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMEIF: 99% vs. VRM: 93%
Market capitalization -- CMEIF: $352.05M vs. VRM: $140.13M
CMEIF [@Automotive Aftermarket] is valued at $352.05M. VRM’s [@Automotive Aftermarket] market capitalization is $140.13M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Automotive Aftermarket] industry ranges from $50.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Automotive Aftermarket] industry is $4.24B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMEIF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileVRM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CMEIF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • VRM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CMEIF is a better buy in the long-term than VRM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMEIF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VRM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMEIF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • VRM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CMEIF is a better buy in the short-term than VRM.

Price Growth

CMEIF (@Automotive Aftermarket) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while VRM (@Automotive Aftermarket) price change was -4.28% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Automotive Aftermarket industry was -0.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.35%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Automotive Aftermarket (-0.30% weekly)

The Automotive Aftermarket consists of the manufacturing, remanufacturing, distribution, retailing, and installation of vehicle parts and accessories, after the sale of the automobile by the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) to the consumer. The aftermarket parts many not be manufactured by the OEM. According to a Technavio study, the US automotive parts aftermarket size is estimated to grow by USD 24.33 billion during 2018-2022 (CAGR 3%). Like many other industries, the automotive aftermarket is also being intensely penetrated by the digital boom. The online auto parts sales market is predicted to exceed $13B by 2020 (according to a study by Mirakl).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMEIF($352M) has a higher market cap than VRM($140M). VRM YTD gains are higher at: 439.721 vs. CMEIF (-16.200).
CMEIFVRMCMEIF / VRM
Capitalization352M140M251%
EBITDAN/A-15.09M-
Gain YTD-16.200439.721-4%
P/E Ratio37.37N/A-
RevenueN/A11.6M-
Total CashN/A14.3M-
Total DebtN/A779M-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMEIFVRM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
27%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
9%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
4%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CMEIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VRM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ARRXF0.190.02
+8.82%
Archer Materials Ltd.
KTWIY67.50N/A
N/A
Kurita Water Industries Ltd.
NRRWF0.03N/A
N/A
Nuran Wireless Inc
RFNDF1.28N/A
N/A
Rural Funds Group Stapled Securities
SMCAY14.84-0.01
-0.07%
SMC Corp

CMEIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CMEIF and CZASF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CMEIF and CZASF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMEIF
1D Price
Change %
CMEIF100%
N/A
CZASF - CMEIF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MNSO - CMEIF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.93%
VRM - CMEIF
2%
Poorly correlated
-2.49%
BWMX - CMEIF
-0%
Poorly correlated
+1.19%
CYYHF - CMEIF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

VRM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VRM has been loosely correlated with CVNA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VRM jumps, then CVNA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VRM
1D Price
Change %
VRM100%
-2.49%
CVNA - VRM
33%
Loosely correlated
+2.17%
WSM - VRM
30%
Poorly correlated
+5.61%
HVT - VRM
27%
Poorly correlated
+5.84%
GPI - VRM
26%
Poorly correlated
+2.07%
RH - VRM
25%
Poorly correlated
+6.34%
More