It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CME’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while.
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CME’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
CME (@Financial Publishing/Services) experienced а +4.47% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was +0.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.17%.
CME is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2026.
The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.
CME | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 26 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 49 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 19 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 58 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 34 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 26 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CME | TBLD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 37% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 43% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 56% | 3 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 47% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 51% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 52% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 48% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 8 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 41% | 3 days ago 75% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | N/A |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| INDY | 52.98 | -0.44 | -0.82% |
| iShares India 50 ETF | |||
| PFF | 30.84 | -0.29 | -0.93% |
| iShares Preferred&Income Securities ETF | |||
| UMMA | 28.45 | -0.42 | -1.47% |
| Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF | |||
| AMZW | 46.45 | -1.69 | -3.51% |
| Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF | |||
| ROKT | 75.71 | -2.88 | -3.67% |
| Stt Strt® SPDR® S&PKenshoFnlFrntrsETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CME has been loosely correlated with CBOE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CME jumps, then CBOE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CME | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CME | 100% | +1.42% | ||
| CBOE - CME | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.35% | ||
| ICE - CME | 46% Loosely correlated | -0.88% | ||
| TW - CME | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.10% | ||
| MKTX - CME | 35% Loosely correlated | +2.52% | ||
| FDS - CME | 27% Poorly correlated | +2.23% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor tells us that TBLD and BHP have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TBLD and BHP's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TBLD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TBLD | 100% | -0.54% | ||
| BHP - TBLD | 10% Poorly correlated | +0.99% | ||
| TSM - TBLD | 6% Poorly correlated | -0.19% | ||
| JPM - TBLD | 2% Poorly correlated | +1.52% | ||
| T - TBLD | -1% Poorly correlated | +1.87% | ||
| CME - TBLD | -3% Poorly correlated | +0.27% |