CMDXF
Price
$4.42
Change
-$0.07 (-1.56%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
361.61M
WK
Price
$77.78
Change
+$0.49 (+0.63%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
4.36B
55 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CMDXF vs WK

Header iconCMDXF vs WK Comparison
Open Charts CMDXF vs WKBanner chart's image
Computer Modelling Group
Price$4.42
Change-$0.07 (-1.56%)
Volume$12.66K
Capitalization361.61M
Workiva
Price$77.78
Change+$0.49 (+0.63%)
Volume$686.77K
Capitalization4.36B
CMDXF vs WK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CMDXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMDXF vs. WK commentary
Sep 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMDXF is a Hold and WK is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 04, 2025
Stock price -- (CMDXF: $4.42 vs. WK: $77.78)
Brand notoriety: CMDXF and WK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMDXF: 46% vs. WK: 92%
Market capitalization -- CMDXF: $361.61M vs. WK: $4.36B
CMDXF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $361.61M. WK’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $4.36B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $313.43B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMDXF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWK’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CMDXF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CMDXF is a better buy in the long-term than WK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMDXF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WK’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMDXF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CMDXF is a better buy in the short-term than WK.

Price Growth

CMDXF (@Packaged Software) experienced а -5.43% price change this week, while WK (@Packaged Software) price change was -3.22% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -2.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.41%.

Reported Earning Dates

WK is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-2.19% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WK($4.36B) has a higher market cap than CMDXF($362M). WK YTD gains are higher at: -28.968 vs. CMDXF (-40.423). CMDXF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 41.6M vs. WK (-34.99M). WK has more cash in the bank: 814M vs. CMDXF (44M). CMDXF has less debt than WK: CMDXF (38.2M) vs WK (794M). WK has higher revenues than CMDXF: WK (807M) vs CMDXF (129M).
CMDXFWKCMDXF / WK
Capitalization362M4.36B8%
EBITDA41.6M-34.99M-119%
Gain YTD-40.423-28.968140%
P/E Ratio23.37N/A-
Revenue129M807M16%
Total Cash44M814M5%
Total Debt38.2M794M5%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMDXF vs WK: Fundamental Ratings
CMDXF
WK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
536
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
8
Undervalued
99
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8683
SMR RATING
1..100
34100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8960
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
93100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CMDXF's Valuation (8) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for WK (99) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CMDXF’s stock grew significantly faster than WK’s over the last 12 months.

WK's Profit vs Risk Rating (83) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as CMDXF (86) in the null industry. This means that WK’s stock grew similarly to CMDXF’s over the last 12 months.

CMDXF's SMR Rating (34) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for WK (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CMDXF’s stock grew significantly faster than WK’s over the last 12 months.

WK's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as CMDXF (89) in the null industry. This means that WK’s stock grew similarly to CMDXF’s over the last 12 months.

CMDXF's P/E Growth Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as WK (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CMDXF’s stock grew similarly to WK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMDXFWK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CMDXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FNKCX16.420.08
+0.49%
Frank Value C
FTHCX93.48N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Technology C
NOSGX13.77N/A
N/A
Northern Small Cap Value
QRLVX34.54N/A
N/A
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value R
CEIIX13.94-0.08
-0.57%
Manning & Napier Callodine Equity Inc I

CMDXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CMDXF and PANW have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CMDXF and PANW's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMDXF
1D Price
Change %
CMDXF100%
-1.60%
PANW - CMDXF
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.53%
OTGLF - CMDXF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
STBEF - CMDXF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GRVY - CMDXF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.51%
WK - CMDXF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.63%
More

WK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WK has been loosely correlated with QTWO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WK jumps, then QTWO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WK
1D Price
Change %
WK100%
+0.63%
QTWO - WK
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.87%
GTLB - WK
53%
Loosely correlated
-1.64%
XYZ - WK
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.58%
PATH - WK
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.18%
RNG - WK
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.17%
More