CMDXF
Price
$5.11
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
610.17M
STBEF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 5 closing price
Capitalization
155.83M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CMDXF vs STBEF

Header iconCMDXF vs STBEF Comparison
Open Charts CMDXF vs STBEFBanner chart's image
Computer Modelling Group
Price$5.11
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$27.29K
Capitalization610.17M
STARBREEZE AB
Price$0.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.86K
Capitalization155.83M
CMDXF vs STBEF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CMDXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMDXF vs. STBEF commentary
Jul 01, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMDXF is a StrongBuy and STBEF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 01, 2025
Stock price -- (CMDXF: $5.11 vs. STBEF: $0.03)
Brand notoriety: CMDXF and STBEF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMDXF: 137% vs. STBEF: 100%
Market capitalization -- CMDXF: $610.17M vs. STBEF: $155.83M
CMDXF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $610.17M. STBEF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $155.83M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMDXF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSTBEF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CMDXF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • STBEF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CMDXF is a better buy in the long-term than STBEF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMDXF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CMDXF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.

Price Growth

CMDXF (@Packaged Software) experienced а -3.95% price change this week, while STBEF (@Packaged Software) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +3.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.66%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+3.75% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMDXF($610M) has a higher market cap than STBEF($156M). STBEF YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. CMDXF (-31.123). CMDXF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 39.5M vs. STBEF (3.09M). STBEF has more cash in the bank: 78M vs. CMDXF (45.2M). STBEF has less debt than CMDXF: STBEF (17.9M) vs CMDXF (37.8M). STBEF has higher revenues than CMDXF: STBEF (131M) vs CMDXF (96.7M).
CMDXFSTBEFCMDXF / STBEF
Capitalization610M156M391%
EBITDA39.5M3.09M1,277%
Gain YTD-31.1230.000-
P/E Ratio35.13N/A-
Revenue96.7M131M74%
Total Cash45.2M78M58%
Total Debt37.8M17.9M211%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMDXF vs STBEF: Fundamental Ratings
CMDXF
STBEF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
11
Undervalued
56
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
70100
SMR RATING
1..100
3397
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6474
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
902
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CMDXF's Valuation (11) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for STBEF (56). This means that CMDXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than STBEF’s over the last 12 months.

CMDXF's Profit vs Risk Rating (70) in the null industry is in the same range as STBEF (100). This means that CMDXF’s stock grew similarly to STBEF’s over the last 12 months.

CMDXF's SMR Rating (33) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for STBEF (97). This means that CMDXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than STBEF’s over the last 12 months.

CMDXF's Price Growth Rating (64) in the null industry is in the same range as STBEF (74). This means that CMDXF’s stock grew similarly to STBEF’s over the last 12 months.

STBEF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CMDXF (90). This means that STBEF’s stock grew significantly faster than CMDXF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMDXFSTBEF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
51%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
28%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
29%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CMDXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PBCJX48.940.43
+0.89%
Principal Blue Chip J
IPMSX19.210.07
+0.37%
Voya Index Plus MidCap Port S
BBISX32.840.08
+0.25%
Sterling Capital Behav Lg Cp Val Eq Intl
BRMIX15.390.02
+0.13%
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Index Instl
SMSAX9.840.01
+0.10%
SEI Multi Strategy Alternatives F (SIMT)

CMDXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CMDXF and PANW have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CMDXF and PANW's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMDXF
1D Price
Change %
CMDXF100%
N/A
PANW - CMDXF
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.87%
OTGLF - CMDXF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
STBEF - CMDXF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GRVY - CMDXF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.53%
WK - CMDXF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.03%
More

STBEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, STBEF has been closely correlated with IDGAF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if STBEF jumps, then IDGAF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To STBEF
1D Price
Change %
STBEF100%
N/A
IDGAF - STBEF
74%
Closely correlated
N/A
OTGLF - STBEF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CMDXF - STBEF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
INFA - STBEF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ODD - STBEF
21%
Poorly correlated
+4.58%
More