CMDXF
Price
$5.48
Change
-$0.08 (-1.44%)
Updated
Jul 18 closing price
Capitalization
610.17M
OTGLF
Price
$74.10
Change
-$1.90 (-2.50%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
4.08B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CMDXF vs OTGLF

Header iconCMDXF vs OTGLF Comparison
Open Charts CMDXF vs OTGLFBanner chart's image
Computer Modelling Group
Price$5.48
Change-$0.08 (-1.44%)
Volume$7.74K
Capitalization610.17M
CD Projekt SA
Price$74.10
Change-$1.90 (-2.50%)
Volume$184
Capitalization4.08B
CMDXF vs OTGLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CMDXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OTGLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMDXF vs. OTGLF commentary
Jul 21, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMDXF is a Buy and OTGLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 21, 2025
Stock price -- (CMDXF: $5.48 vs. OTGLF: $74.10)
Brand notoriety: CMDXF and OTGLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMDXF: 40% vs. OTGLF: 81%
Market capitalization -- CMDXF: $610.17M vs. OTGLF: $4.08B
CMDXF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $610.17M. OTGLF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $4.08B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.77B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMDXF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileOTGLF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CMDXF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • OTGLF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, OTGLF is a better buy in the long-term than CMDXF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMDXF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OTGLF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMDXF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • OTGLF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CMDXF is a better buy in the short-term than OTGLF.

Price Growth

CMDXF (@Packaged Software) experienced а +2.68% price change this week, while OTGLF (@Packaged Software) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +1.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.45%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+1.38% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OTGLF($4.08B) has a higher market cap than CMDXF($610M). OTGLF has higher P/E ratio than CMDXF: OTGLF (45.25) vs CMDXF (35.13). OTGLF YTD gains are higher at: 66.898 vs. CMDXF (-26.136). OTGLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 503M vs. CMDXF (39.5M). OTGLF has more cash in the bank: 921M vs. CMDXF (45.2M). CMDXF has less debt than OTGLF: CMDXF (37.8M) vs OTGLF (46.9M). OTGLF has higher revenues than CMDXF: OTGLF (911M) vs CMDXF (96.7M).
CMDXFOTGLFCMDXF / OTGLF
Capitalization610M4.08B15%
EBITDA39.5M503M8%
Gain YTD-26.13666.898-39%
P/E Ratio35.1345.2578%
Revenue96.7M911M11%
Total Cash45.2M921M5%
Total Debt37.8M46.9M81%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMDXF vs OTGLF: Fundamental Ratings
CMDXF
OTGLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3350
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
12
Undervalued
31
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
79100
SMR RATING
1..100
3451
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6238
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
898
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CMDXF's Valuation (12) in the null industry is in the same range as OTGLF (31). This means that CMDXF’s stock grew similarly to OTGLF’s over the last 12 months.

CMDXF's Profit vs Risk Rating (79) in the null industry is in the same range as OTGLF (100). This means that CMDXF’s stock grew similarly to OTGLF’s over the last 12 months.

CMDXF's SMR Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as OTGLF (51). This means that CMDXF’s stock grew similarly to OTGLF’s over the last 12 months.

OTGLF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as CMDXF (62). This means that OTGLF’s stock grew similarly to CMDXF’s over the last 12 months.

OTGLF's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CMDXF (89). This means that OTGLF’s stock grew significantly faster than CMDXF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMDXFOTGLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
64%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CMDXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OTGLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MTCAX65.910.22
+0.33%
MFS Technology A
HGIYX56.89-0.04
-0.07%
Hartford Core Equity Y
FMXKX7.97-0.01
-0.13%
Federated Hermes Max-Cap Index R
MYIFX20.64-0.03
-0.15%
Monetta Young Investor Growth
HGHCX21.61-0.20
-0.92%
Hartford Healthcare C

CMDXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CMDXF and PANW have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CMDXF and PANW's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMDXF
1D Price
Change %
CMDXF100%
-1.44%
PANW - CMDXF
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.25%
OTGLF - CMDXF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
STBEF - CMDXF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GRVY - CMDXF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WK - CMDXF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

OTGLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that OTGLF and STBEF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OTGLF and STBEF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OTGLF
1D Price
Change %
OTGLF100%
N/A
STBEF - OTGLF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CMDXF - OTGLF
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.44%
CFLT - OTGLF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.20%
RELY - OTGLF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.96%
PLGGF - OTGLF
23%
Poorly correlated
+11.11%
More