Advertisement
CMCSA vs TDS
Notable companies
Industry description
Market Cap
High and low price notable news
Volume
Fundamental Analysis Ratings
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
Notable companies
Market Cap
High and low price notable news
Volume
Fundamental Analysis Ratings
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMCSA is a StrongBuy and TDS is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CMCSA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTDS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CMCSA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- TDS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CMCSA’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TDS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CMCSA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
- TDS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CMCSA (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а +1.47% price change this week, while TDS (@Major Telecommunications) price change was -1.36% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was +1.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.05%.
Reported Earning Dates
CMCSA is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2026.
TDS is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Major Telecommunications (+1.06% weekly)Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.
| CMCSA | TDS | CMCSA / TDS | |
| Capitalization | 99.2B | 4.44B | 2,233% |
| EBITDA | 47.4B | 1.39B | 3,417% |
| Gain YTD | -23.680 | 13.104 | -181% |
| P/E Ratio | 4.52 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 123B | 4.86B | 2,531% |
| Total Cash | 9.33B | 933M | 999% |
| Total Debt | 99.1B | 1.41B | 7,028% |
CMCSA | TDS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 19 | 70 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 34 Fair valued | 73 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 35 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 37 | 92 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | 53 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 96 | 19 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CMCSA's Valuation (34) in the Cable Or Satellite TV industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TDS (73) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry. This means that CMCSA’s stock grew somewhat faster than TDS’s over the last 12 months.
TDS's Profit vs Risk Rating (35) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMCSA (100) in the Cable Or Satellite TV industry. This means that TDS’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMCSA’s over the last 12 months.
CMCSA's SMR Rating (37) in the Cable Or Satellite TV industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TDS (92) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry. This means that CMCSA’s stock grew somewhat faster than TDS’s over the last 12 months.
TDS's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is in the same range as CMCSA (63) in the Cable Or Satellite TV industry. This means that TDS’s stock grew similarly to CMCSA’s over the last 12 months.
TDS's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is significantly better than the same rating for CMCSA (96) in the Cable Or Satellite TV industry. This means that TDS’s stock grew significantly faster than CMCSA’s over the last 12 months.
| CMCSA | TDS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 57% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 51% | 3 days ago 74% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 49% | 3 days ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 50% | 3 days ago 69% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 50% | 3 days ago 67% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 48% | 3 days ago 68% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 56% | 5 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 54% | 3 days ago 70% |
Advertisement
CMCSA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMCSA has been closely correlated with LBRDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CMCSA jumps, then LBRDA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CMCSA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CMCSA | 100% | +0.07% | ||
| LBRDA - CMCSA | 71% Closely correlated | -0.69% | ||
| CHTR - CMCSA | 70% Closely correlated | -0.58% | ||
| LBRDK - CMCSA | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.67% | ||
| LBTYA - CMCSA | 36% Loosely correlated | +0.36% | ||
| T - CMCSA | 34% Loosely correlated | -0.37% | ||
More | ||||
TDS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TDS has been loosely correlated with AD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TDS jumps, then AD could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TDS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TDS | 100% | +1.37% | ||
| AD - TDS | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.12% | ||
| LBTYK - TDS | 43% Loosely correlated | +0.45% | ||
| VEON - TDS | 34% Loosely correlated | +0.12% | ||
| CXDO - TDS | 30% Poorly correlated | -0.14% | ||
| CMCSA - TDS | 30% Poorly correlated | +0.07% | ||
More | ||||